• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

“It was definitely the last option”: Heiberger breaks down Town’s downfall at TRD forum

Amir Korangy and Andrew Heiberger (Credit: Jhila Farzaneh for The Real Deal)

On the evening of April 18, Andrew Heiberger was staring hard at Town Residential’s first-quarter results. The numbers glaring back at him were “way off” and his managers’ end-of-year projections were dismal.

No amount of cost-cutting or office closures could keep the firm afloat, he decided. That night, he called his wife and ex-wife to break the news. And by the following afternoon, Town managers and agents were packing up their desks, ending months of speculation about the brokerage’s future amid rumors of unpaid commission and late rent.

“It was definitely the last option,” Heiberger said during a one-on-one talk with The Real Deal’s publisher Amir Korangy on Monday, referring to the closure of Town’s sales and leasing businesses. “And really the only option.”

But Heiberger — who used TRD’s 11th annual New York showcase to tell his side of the story — didn’t offer a mea culpa.

He said he worked 18 hours a day, seven days a week since launching the firm in 2010, and kept Town afloat until factors beyond his control forced his hand.

“I don’t think the traditional brokerage model is sustainable,” he said, citing ferocious competition for agents, high fixed costs and rising commission splits. “We’ve been disrupted.”

In the months leading up to Town’s closure, Heiberger said he tried to stem the losses. He closed offices in Brooklyn and Queens, and Town cut back on salaries. At one point, Heiberger said he considered scrapping its information technology department. (Under that scenario, Town would have used StreetEasy to focus on buy-side business.)

But to industry observers, Town’s fall ends a roller coaster of highs and lows. During its eight years, it did nearly $13.5 billion in real estate deals, Heiberger has previously said. And at its height, it had nearly 600 agents.

In 2013, Town received a $119 million offer from a major real estate company to acquire 60 percent of the firm. But it never materialized.

When asked why he didn’t take the deal, Heiberger said, “You’re going to have to ask someone else that.”

Without naming names on Monday, Heiberger placed the blame on Town’s backer, Joseph Sitt of Thor Equities. The two sparred publicly in 2013 and 2014 over a failure to meet certain financial targets.

In 2016, the two buried the hatchet, leaving Heiberger as Town’s sole owner.

“I’m the kind of person that finishes what he starts,” Heiberger said. “I hung in there for six years to finally gain the full control of my company back, I put my head back down the next day to try to get it back to where it was.”

Andrew Heiberger (Credit: Jhila Farzaneh for The Real Deal)

By 2017, Town eliminated a $10 million annual loss and that year lost $670,000.

But at that point, the market had changed. Last year, StreetEasy began charging agents to post rental listings, and New York brokers were duking it out over a syndicated listings feed. At the same time, Compass has raised $775 million at a $2.2 billion valuation, giving it the wherewithal to recruit top agents.

Though Town scaled incredibly fast after its launch, Heiberger disagreed with the word “poaching” to describe its aggressive hiring early on.

“I don’t like the word ‘poaching,’” he said. “I do think that recruiting is fair. And I do think real estate brokers deserve to have opportunities presented to them.” He said when he started Town, the “behemoths were having their way with brokers.”

But critics have said Town did change the recruiting game. And, they said, Heiberger spent lavishly on parties and perks for agents.

“I’ve never spent more than $125,000 on our holiday event,” he countered. “The total cost of the holiday event is a lot less than having four front-row seats the Knicks game,” he added, taking a shot at Douglas Elliman.

During a later panel on Monday, CORE’s Shaun Osher said he disagreed with the notion that the traditional brokerage model is  unsustainable. “It is very sustainable if it’s run a certain way and effectively,” he said. “And you can applaud for that if you want.”

But Town wasn’t immune to growing pressure to pay agents higher commission splits. The firm’s commission payout averaged around 74 percent before it shuttered its sales and leasing divisions on April 19.

“There were about 10 percent of the people in our firm doing the lion’s share of the business,” Heiberger said. “And they were at very high splits.”

Even if given the opportunity, Heiberger said he wouldn’t do things differently. “I accomplished what I set out to do,” he said. “I did get a bona fide offer for a ton of money.”

Heiberger said he doesn’t have a plan for what’s next. Brokerages of the future, he believes, will offer a la carte services to agents. And despite the challenges, new development isn’t dead.

“I do want to reiterate: I do not think the Town Residential brand deserves to have a toe tag,” he said. Heiberger is personally involved in two new development projects that he will continue working on.

“As long as I don’t have a toe tag,” he said, “those projects can get completed by me.”

Amir Korangy (Credit: Jhila Farzaneh for The Real Deal)

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 14 May 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Could Garcetti’s emergency homeless shelter impact Koreatown’s rebound? →← CalSTRS bets $300M on real estate with longtime partner, Divco
  • Recent Posts

    • Concord Capital grabs five historic apartment buildings across LA for nearly $80M July 31, 2025
    • Tishman Speyer selling $200M-plus Beverly Hills office building July 31, 2025
    • Fisher Phillips grows Los Angeles footprint in city’s latest law firm expansion July 31, 2025
    • Jamison plans another office-to-resi conversion in Koreatown July 30, 2025
    • Los Angeles council member urges Newsom to pause SB 9 in Palisades July 30, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM