• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Santa Monica prevails over Airbnb in court

Santa Monica Pier and Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky

The City of Santa Monica won a big victory in U.S. District Court on Thursday over persistent adversary Airbnb.

Judge Otis D. Wright II dismissed Airbnb’s challenge to Santa Monica’s home-sharing ordinance and ruled that the platform must verify its hosts are registered with the city, according to the Santa Monica Daily Press.

Airbnb claimed the ordinance violated the First and Fourth amendments, the federal Communications Decency Act, and the California Coastal Act.

Wright decided that the ordinance was not directed at Airbnb’s publishing of listings, but was aimed at stopping illegal business transactions. The decision was consistent with previous court rulings related to Airbnb’s activities in San Francisco, according to the Daily Press.

Airbnb issued a statement on Monday saying the company would continue to pursue a pending appeal. “For more than two years,  Airbnb sought to work with the City of Santa Monica on a solution that ensures middle and lower class families who want to visit the coast can find an affordable place to stay. Despite our efforts, the city insisted on an approach that violates federal law” the statement said. 

Santa Monica has some of the strictest rules against short-term rentals of any city in L.A. County. It passed its home-sharing ordinance in 2015, and Airbnb sued in 2016. Besides requiring host registration, it bars hosts from renting out their homes when they aren’t present. Wright’s ruling crosses out one more option for the popular platform.

The Communications Decency Act has come up in a number of court cases involving home-sharing. The 1996 law is meant to protect online businesses from any illegal conduct of users.

A different U.S. District Court judge, Dolly M. Gee, ruled in Airbnb’s favor in January in a case against Aimco, a Denver real estate-investment trust. Aimco wanted Airbnb held liable for short-term rentals listed at its Park La Brea property, which it forbade. Airbnb claimed protections under the Communications Decency Act and Gee ultimately ruled in the company’s favor, arguing it was up to a tenant to ensure they are not violating a lease.

Santa Monica officials claim that less than 20 percent of short-term rentals in the city comply with the ordinance and that hosts have come up with creative ways to skirt it, like taking down listings during City Hall hours to hide them from employees.

Santa Monica separately announced on Monday that real estate agent Shabi Jafri pleaded no contest against five misdemeanor counts for renting nine units in the city without permits. Jafri must perform 140 hours of community service, pay the city $3,600, and was placed on two years of probation.
[Santa Monica Daily Press] – Dennis Lynch 

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 18 June 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Amid exodus to El Segundo, LAT will maintain outpost in DTLA: sources →← John Aaroe returns from “retirement” for second time
  • Recent Posts

    • Mayor Karen Bass blasts everyone but herself for wildfire mishandling May 7, 2025
    • WEA, Beverly Hills Estates cut deal on $27M Malibu Colony home May 7, 2025
    • Oil firm eyes homes, hotel near Bolsa Chica wetlands in Huntington Beach May 7, 2025
    • Bankrupt Rite Aid to market 1.3K stores, including dozens in LA County May 7, 2025
    • Carolwood flexes with new LA pocket listings portal, boasting $1B+ in inventory May 7, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM