• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

“Trash-talking” and “distortion”: What a tech rival is saying about Compass

In an open letter, the CEO of a rival brokerage is accusing Compass of “trash-talking” and “distortion.” (Credit: iStock and IK Films via Google)

It’s the open letter ricocheting around the residential brokerage world.

Addressed to Compass, the lengthy missive is full of zingers accusing the New York-based startup of “trash-talking,” “distortion” and being “boastful.” It concludes by inviting Compass to “set the record straight.”

About what? According to the letter’s author, York Baur, CEO of MoxiWorks — a cloud-based technology platform for agents — Compass has overstated its market share and agent retention rate, and exaggerated claims of building new agent technology tools from scratch.

Posted to Seattle-based MoxiWorks’ website on Monday, the letter accuses Compass of licensing tech from third-party providers like MailChimp for email marketing and Mopro for website design.

“These are all fine choices, but you don’t ‘build everything in house,’ so why the distortion?” Baur wrote. “The tech stack you tout is something every other brokerage can quite literally replicate on the open market — many already have.”

It’s not the first time the venture-capital backed Compass has faced the equivalent of a political attack ad. In 2016, a 16-page presentation (alleging broker poaching and data theft) was sent to a host of rival firms in New York and Los Angeles.

In Baur’s case, however, the letter may also be an attempt to win business for his firm.

MoxiWorks, which officially launched in 2012, was spun out of Windermere Real Estate, a Seattle-based brokerage that is now a competitor of Compass. According to its website, MoxiWorks claims to have 60 brokerage offices and 110,000 agent clients, including Howard Hanna and Long & Foster.

Baur’s letter contains a certain amount of navel-gazing — such as his statement that the “first wave of brokerage tech” took place in the 1990s when Windermere launched one of the first known brokerage websites. During the 2000s, he said, there were some other “obvious examples of innovative technology use,” including Zillow and Redfin.

In the letter, Baur threw shade at Compass’ retention rate, which he pegged at just 245 days on average — without explaining how he arrived at that figure. The letter did disclose the source of its claim that Compass had overstated market share in Seattle. Compass says it has 5 percent market share in the city. Citing MoxiWorks data — which it says encompasses 90 percent of U.S. home sales — Baur claims Compass was involved in less than 1 percent of Seattle deals.

In response, Compass’ head of communications, Julie Binder, said “Moxiworks’ op-ed about Compass is an explicit pitch to buy their software.”

MoxiWorks also claims that Compass has just 0.4 percent market share in New York City, arguably one of its strongest markets. But according to The Real Deal‘s annual ranking of residential firms, Compass ranked fourth with $1.37 billion in closed sell-side deals in Manhattan last year.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 31 July 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
West Coast Capital buys Cerritos office tower →← Essex proposes 21-vendor food hall at Santee Court apartments in DTLA
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM