• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

In monumental vote, commissioners advance Centennial mega-project

Gregory Medeiros, Gregory S. Bielli and the project

The Regional Planning Commission voted 4-1 on Wednesday to advance the contentious Centennial project, drawing the potential for a new city to rise 60 miles north of Los Angeles a big step closer.

The development, the subject of a protracted battle between developers and environmentalists for some two decades, would create nearly 20,000 new homes and 10 million square feet of commercial space. It now moves forward to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors for a final vote.

The 12,000-acre project has become a symbol of the tension between forces searching for answers to L.A.’s affordable housing crisis and those concerned about development in far-off areas where such projects would create new urban sprawl.

To win the planning commission’s approval, Tejon Ranch Co., the developer, agreed to increase the affordable housing component from 10 percent to 15 percent. Tejon also offered to assume all the costs of building the infrastructure — including sheriff’s stations and libraries — on the undeveloped swath of land, meaning there would be no cost to taxpayers.

But Tejon refused a commissioner’s recommendation to include 300 units of homeless housing — passing that to the Board of Supervisors to decide.

The concessions did little to appease the project’s opponents, who dominated the speakers at the six-hour hearing.

The Commission “just greenlighted the most environmentally destructive sprawl project in recent memory,” said J.P. Rose, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The county should focus development in existing cities instead of approving sprawl dozens of miles away from jobs.”

Commissioner Chairman David Louie said that he appreciated the commitment to not pass on costs to taxpayers. But he noted that the concession by developers meant they had likely raised an estimated $1 and $2 billion in fresh investment.

Tejon Ranch developers also agreed to a 30 percent local hiring requirement, an improved transportation system, incentives to attract medical providers and six acres of open space for every 1,000 people on the ranch.

Despite Tuesday’s vote in favor, the commission left several issues to the Board of Supervisors to tackle, including homeless housing, medical care and open space requirements.

At the fifth public hearing on Centennial, 36 speakers lined up to discuss the project, which has been the subject of debate since 1999. Most said they opposed the development.

“It’s worse than urban sprawl — it’s leapfrog urban sprawl, where the cancer has gone into another organism,” said Tom Budlong, an L.A. County resident. “The impacts are unmitigatable.”

The meeting concluded with only one “no” vote, by Commissioner Laura Shell, who advocated for a public agency to govern open spaces like Tejon.

In defense of his vote in favor, Commissioners Pat Modugno reflected the tension over the proposed project.

“Property owners do have a right to use a property to the best of their economic purchases,” he said.

Yet, he added, “I will probably not enjoy the traffic and not enjoy driving past new communities where I remembered open space.”

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 29 August 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Long Beach reaches for the sky with new downtown towers →← Here’s why home-builders’ shares are tumbling this year
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM