• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Zoning law goes to Jerry Brown with far fewer teeth

State Senator Scott Wiener and homes under construction

When State Senator Scott Wiener introduced Senate Bill 828 in January, it doubled the amount of land local governments had to zone to meet local housing needs — a potential boon to multifamily developers across the state.

By the time both houses of the state legislature approved SB-828 this week — their last week before taking a two-month recess — lawmakers had gutted that signature provision.

The bill amended existing law that requires local governments to zone for 100 percent of the projected local housing need. The original bill authored by Wiener, a Democrat from San Francisco, brought that up to 200 percent, with the goal of boosting housing production statewide to help alleviate California’s housing crisis.

But lawmakers whittled away at his ambitious proposal. In April they tamped down the required amount of residential-zoned land to 125 percent of local need.

It left the Senate with that requirement in late May. But then the State Assembly knocked that requirement back down to 100 percent.

While not as ambitious as first envisioned, the bill could still result in more residential zoning. The law sent to Governor Jerry Brown’s desk this week allows the state to take into account existing need as well as projected future need when determining zoning allocations.

The bill also sets a minimum target vacancy rate of 5 percent as “healthy,” and a goal of hitting that rate. Areas with lower than that vacancy rate will need to zone for more housing. Local governments will report more data to the state to determine local needs, including the percentage of people spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing.

It also prevents local governments from arguing that underproduction in previous years should cause the state to reduce their requirement going forward. Previously, local governments were only allocated a number of units to meet future demand. Now the state will take into account the existing shortage. So if a city is short 5,000 units but will only add 1,000 residents in the coming years, existing law requires them only to allocate for 1,000 new residents.

An official familiar with the bill said that the changes in some cases could result in a 150 percent boost in the number of units governments will need to accommodate.

Gov. Brown will have a month to sign the bill into law.

SB-828 fared better than SB-827, another housing bill authored by Wiener that would have substantially increased the amount of land zoned for housing by overriding local zoning laws to allow more dense development near transit.

Housing advocates lauded the bill, but many local governments and residents living near transit opposed it, because it took planning power away from them and put it in the hands of the state.

The bill died in its first Senate hearing, despite significant reductions to its provisions. Wiener said he will return with a new version of the bill next year.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 31 August 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Santa Monica to allow e-scooter companies to take flight, but with limitations →← Wildfires push insurers to abandon CA homeowners
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM