• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Tejon Ranch’s Centennial project passes in landmark 4-1 vote

Greg Madeiros, Kathryn Barger, and Tejon Ranch

In a landmark decision, the Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to approve the highly contentious Centennial project, setting the stage for the construction of a massive planned community in a region starved for housing.

The 4-1 vote allows for the construction of nearly 20,000 housing units and 10 million square feet of commercial space in Tejon Ranch, an undeveloped swath of land 60 miles north of Los Angeles County.

Centennial has been the subject of a protracted struggle between environmentalists and Tejon Ranch, the developer, since its inception nearly two decades ago. At Tuesday’s hearing, more than 100 speakers gave emotional testimonials about the project — both in favor and against.

Supervisor Sheila Kuehl was the only board member to vote against the project. She said she was concerned about wildfires, affordable housing and urban sprawl.

“I think there are an enormous amount of things wrong with this project,” Kuehl said during the five-hour long hearing. “I don’t understand and believe the affordable housing promises. I can’t support it.”

In contrast, Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the district where Centennial will be located, called the project “balanced” and “a forward-looking way of governance.”

Much like the previous Regional Planning Commission hearings, affordable housing took center stage during Tuesday’s discussion.

After some deliberation, the board passed a motion requiring the developer to hike the affordable housing component from 15 percent to 18 percent. Originally, the developer had proposed building only 10 percent affordable.

Greg Madeiros, vice president of community development at Tejon Ranch, said any increase in the affordable housing component would add an average of $25,000 to the price of market-rate housing. The firm has also yet to determine how they are going to determine who qualifies for affordable housing.

Many of the testimonials against the project cited concerns about the project location. It currently sits on a “high” and “very high” fire-hazard severity zones, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

“Centennial will pave over thousands of acres of irreplaceable wildlands, put residents at extreme wildfire risk, and clog our already congested freeways,” said J.P. Rose, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. ”Our county needs housing near existing job centers, not isolated developments in remote wildlands.”

Others, such as the Valley Industry and Commerce Association, welcomed the news.

“VICA applauds the board for choosing to build more housing and approving this forward-thinking project that will provide over 19,000 new homes and generate 23,000 jobs for LA County,” VICA president Stuart Waldman said in an emailed statement.

The Regional Planning Commission voted in late August to advance the project.

The Board of Supervisors’ decision to approve the project comes just days after the Kern County Board of Supervisors rescinded its approvals for another Tejon Ranch project — Grapevine. Late last week, a judge rejected the project’s environmental impact report on the basis that it failed to consider fully how traffic will impact the area.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 11 December 2018
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Zillow expands home-buying program to Riverside, CA →← Demand for hotel rooms, along with pricing, shot up with California’s wildfires
  • Recent Posts

    • Resi occupancy soars above pre-pandemic levels in Downtown LA May 22, 2025
    • Hines gets key approval on Arts District office project May 22, 2025
    • Construction doesn’t scare off buyer of $32M Bel-Air manse May 22, 2025
    • Damavandi’s Santa Monica resi plan gains weight May 22, 2025
    • Los Angeles hotel executives warn distress to follow wage hike May 22, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM