• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

As investment soars, Metro’s ridership continues to dip

A Metro Rail train at Los Angeles Union Station in July 2007 (Credit: Wikimedia Commons)

As crews dug further under the city to expand the rail system, Los Angeles’ public transportation service lost passengers for the fifth straight year in 2018.

Metro has been losing customers since 2014, CurbedLA reported. There were fewer passengers riding trains last year for the first time since 2015, and over the last decade, L.A. lost a larger share of overall riders than most big-city counterparts.

Meanwhile, taxpayers and investors are pouring billions of dollars into its expansion. Metro plans to address ridership issues by improving stations and making rides smoother. The agency is also exploring systematic changes to make it easier to understand.

Meanwhile, Metro’s future stations continue to guide major real estate projects, and attract development.

State, county and city officials have implemented ways to spur development near transit stations to help ease the housing crisis.

This year, state lawmakers will consider a new version of a bill to allow more development near transit statewide. At the county level, the Board of Supervisors hope to accelerate the approval of projects near future rail stations. And last year, the City of Los Angeles established the Transit Oriented Communities program to incentivize development near future transit stops if they include affordable units.

The program helped spark development in places like Inglewood, Koreatown, and in the San Fernando Valley. And one week in January, all proposed residential developments with less than 50 units were filed under the TOC program. [Curbed] – Gregory Cornfield

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 03 February 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
This is the world’s “money-laundering paradise” →← Atlanta hotels expect to score big time during Super Bowl LIII
  • Recent Posts

    • Is CEQA win first shot at a broader overhaul for resi market?   July 5, 2025
    • Hankey finances bargain-bin hotel buy near SF’s Union Square July 3, 2025
    • Industry group flails as CEQA adjustments hit California builders unevenly July 3, 2025
    • Orange County office tower sells for discounted $19M July 3, 2025
    • City to deploy $425M of “mansion tax” money in record spending plan July 3, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM