• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Comerica Bank turned “blind eye” to Woodbridge’s $1B Ponzi scheme: lawsuit

Comerica CEO Curtis Farmer, Robert Shapiro, and a spec home Woodbridge supposedly planned at an investment property in LA

Comerica CEO Curtis Farmer, Robert Shapiro, and a spec home Woodbridge supposedly planned at an investment property in LA

The $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme that federal authorities charged luxury developer Woodbridge Group of Companies with running has spawned numerous lawsuits.

In the latest, lawyers tasked with recovering funds for defrauded investors are going after Comerica Bank, which held accounts belonging to Sherman Oaks-based Woodbridge.

The suit also comes two weeks after federal agents arrested Robert Shapiro, the former head of Woodbridge and the alleged mastermind behind the scheme. In November, Shapiro agreed to pay the federal government $120 million for his role in the scheme, while Woodbridge and its dizzying array of 281 related entities agreed to pay $892 million.

The federal lawsuit filed last week alleges alleges Comerica turned a “blind eye” to Woodbridge’s suspicious activity in order to profit from the fees Woodbridge paid out. Michael Goldberg, a California attorney the SEC appointed to help recover funds for Woodbridge investors, filed the suit.

The suit alleges that Shapiro “could not have carried out this scheme without either using a complex array of accounts at different banks so that no single bank would be able to detect the ongoing fraud, or having a single bank [Comerica] turn a blind eye” to what it called his “highly irregular banking activities.”

Those activities, the suit alleges, included a high volume of transactions and paying existing investors using new investor cash, which moved through Comerica, the suit alleges. Money from the scheme was used to buy various investment properties in Los Angeles, including a number of high-profile residential properties.

Comerica should have raised alarm bells, the suit claims.

Comerica did not return requests for comment.

It’s the third suit filed against Comerica related to the scandal. Investigators said Sherman Oaks-based Woodbridge and 250 Shapiro-controlled shell companies pulled off the fraud, misleading investors by promising high returns on luxury spec homes. Instead investor money was moved into different entities Shapiro controlled, and new investments were used to pay off older ones.

A group of investors filed a class action suit in California early last year, and a separate class action suit was settled in Florida, also last year.

The latest suit also claims Shapiro spent at least $3.7 million on luxury items for himself, around $1.2 million in alimony to his ex-wife, and paid off $9 million in personal credit card debt with Woodbridge funds. He also transferred an unspecified amount of money to his wife’s company, called Schwartz Media.

The SEC first charged Woodbridge in December 2107, but in December, charged 13 people on related fraud counts.

Trustees tasked with recovering Woodbridge investor funds have offloaded some of those properties, including a development lot in Bel Air and a Hollywood Hills megamansion.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 30 April 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Fed holds interest rates steady amid housing market slowdown →← Israeli bondholders file class-action suit against Starwood
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM