• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Foreclosure nears as judge denies Chapter 11 protection for Mountain of Beverly Hills owner

Victorino Noval and the Mountain of Beverly Hills (Credit: Getty Images and Redfin)

Victorino Noval and the Mountain of Beverly Hills (Credit: Getty Images and Redfin)

UPDATED, July 25, 3:43 p.m.: A judge has denied bankruptcy protection for the owner of the 157-acre development site known as The Mountain of Beverly Hills, The Real Deal has learned. That decision sets the stage for the property’s foreclosure,  one year after it hit the market with the attention and publicity rivaling a Hollywood blockbuster. Instead, it has turned out to be a bomb.

The judge’s order was filed on Thursday, marking a major step in the decades-long dispute over the enormous plot of land, which listed in July 2018 for an astonishing $1 billion.

But the property itself has a far longer and more complicated history, having ensnared the estate of Mark Hughes, along with convicted fraudster Victorino Noval. Even A-listers like Tom Cruise and Steven Spielberg showed a passing interest in purchasing portions of it, according to reports.

As of midday Thursday, The Mountain was still on the Multiple Listings Service for $650 million, after its February massive price chop. Its owner reportedly turned down a $400 million offer last year.

That owner, Secured Capital Partners, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 29, a day before the lender could foreclose on four liens attached to the property. Those loans, provided by the property’s previous owner, Mark Hughes Family Trust, tallied around $190 million.

Filing for bankruptcy protection would have allowed Secured Capital more time to reorganize its debt, attorney Ronald Richards said at the time.

But in their June 19 motion to dismiss, attorneys for the Hughes estate, said “It is time for this epic to end.” In their 40-page motion, lawyers detailed why Secured should be denied protection in court.

Among those reasons were allegations that Noval acquired the property improperly, and was using bankruptcy protection as a means to delay foreclosure. It also detailed the way Noval is tied to both the property and to Secured Capital, which is technically controlled by his son Franco Noval.

“The end of the road”…almost

A source familiar with the case said that Secured Capital could attempt to appeal the decision, or transfer the property to another LLC that could then file for bankruptcy protection. It is unclear whether that tactic would even be allowed, however.

“They’re getting real close to the end of the road,” the person said. “It’s dirty and the court is aware.”

An attorney for Secured Capital declined to comment. Lawyers for the Hughes estate did not respond to requests for comment.

Secured Capital acquired the development site — with the liens attached — from Tower Park Properties, also controlled by the elder Noval, in 2016 through a title transfer.

Tower Park had purchased the property from the Hughes estate in 2004. Loans from the Hughes estate funded that purchase, as well as millions more to develop it at a later date, according to recent court documents. Nothing was ever developed on the land.

But then Tower Park, unable to pay back the loans, filed for bankruptcy protection in 2008. Though the loans were in Tower Park’s name, Secured Capital was the entity in danger of losing the entire property given that it acquired the title with those loans.

Last summer, the property gained nationwide attention when it hit the market for a whopping $1 billion. Its asking price was slashed $350 million in February, after its owners reportedly turned down a $400 million offer. Aaron Kirman of Compass still has the listing.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 25 July 2019
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Colony Capital’s Thomas Barrack will exit as CEO as part of deal to buy digital infrastructure firm →← The beat goes on: GPI Companies sued over plan to demolish Amoeba Records for resi tower
  • Recent Posts

    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM