• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

With malls shut, what happens to Simon and Taubman’s deal?

Robert Taubman and David Simon (Credit: Donato Sardella/Getty Images, Mireya Acierto/Getty Images, iStock)
Robert Taubman and David Simon (Credit: Donato Sardella/Getty Images, Mireya Acierto/Getty Images, iStock)

In mid-February, Simon Property Group announced it would acquire Taubman Centers after a nearly two-decade-long dance between the two rival mall owners.

But as Covid-19 raced around the globe, bringing municipalities and states to a standstill, Simon and Taubman announced that they would temporarily close their properties to slow the contagion.

The news has shaken investors, who have been concerned about the deal moving forward, analysts said. The transaction is set to close later this year.

“I think a lot of investors wish that they would [pull out],” said Haendel St. Juste, managing director at Mizuho Securities USA. “But the merger agreement seems fairly iron-clad.”

Mizuho set up a call with investors and a mergers and acquisitions expert to answer questions about the deal. Investors were wondering about the timing of the transaction and the need to get it through the door, St. Juste said, particularly as a few days after the deal was announced, the coronavirus began taking over Italy.

In a research note, Mizuho said it seems unlikely the pandemic would trigger Simon to exit the agreement through its “material adverse effects” clause. Simon would have to prove, in court, that the pandemic has had a “disproportionate impact” on Taubman in comparison to its peers — in other words, a long-lasting effect. Taubman said it was closing its malls a day after Simon said it would, and Taubman’s two malls in China have already re-opened.

There also is no “force majeure” clause in the agreement that would provide an exit because of unforeseeable circumstances, and there is no financing risk — Simon has already raised the debt capital it needs, the note said.

Simon did not return a request for comment, and a Taubman representative declined to comment.

On Feb. 10 Simon announced it was acquiring an 80 percent stake in Taubman, including the high-end Mall at Short Hills in New Jersey and the Dolphin Mall in Florida, at $52.50 per share. Taubman will keep the rest of the ownership.

Shortly after, the coronavirus outbreak escalated in Italy and throughout Europe, leading to a broad-based sell-off in the public markets as investors digested the news of the virus triggering a global recession. In March, when the virus had become front-page news but before Taubman, Simon and other mall landlords closed their properties, analysts at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey in a note said Taubman’s declining stock price was “suggesting some concern” about the probability of the deal closing. But ultimately, the analysts said the deal was still highly likely to go through.

SunTrust declined to comment further this week.

Simon and Taubman, giants in a sector already troubled by changing consumer preferences and retailer closures, have been hit hard by the coronavirus. As of Tuesday night, Taubman’s stock price had sunk about 20 percent below the agreed deal price, and Simon is underperforming the broader market and a real estate investment trust index, according to Mizuho.

Simon has suffered “a disproportionate amount of pain,” St. Juste said. “I think not only the fact that [the market’s] down, but retailers have an additional challenge here, and then they’re adding the weight of acquiring a portfolio in the middle of all of this.”

Alexander Goldfarb, managing director and senior research analyst at Piper Sandler, said it is difficult to imagine the deal not closing because it has been decades in the making and would create long-term value.

Taubman fought off a hostile takeover bid from Simon and Westfield (now Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield) in 2003, and industry watchers have long said that Simon and Taubman would be better together.

“It is a deal that gets [Simon] 10 of the best malls in the country,” Goldfarb said. “There’s no out mechanism for Simon, so that would be some pretty intense litigation.”

The mall closures should not have an adverse impact on the firms’ fundamentals in the long run, said Goldfarb, who views the pandemic as a short-term hurdle.

He added that if the firms’ top malls “don’t overcome this, the country’s got much bigger issues.”

Shortly before noon Wednesday, as markets were lifting after Congress struck a deal for a $2 trillion stimulus, Taubman’s stock was trading at $45.59 and Simon’s was at $59.31.

Write to Mary Diduch at md@therealdeal.com and Rich Bockmann at rb@therealdeal.com

The post With malls shut, what happens to Simon and Taubman’s deal? appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 25 March 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Massive stimulus package has limited upside for real estate →← “It is catastrophic:” Sam Nazarian, Kobi Karp talk coronavirus toll
  • Recent Posts

    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM