• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

“Unlawful” and “hypocritical”: WeWork members threaten legal action over fees

(Credit: Alex Tai/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images, iStock)
(Credit: Alex Tai/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images, iStock)

A group of WeWork members is threatening the co-working giant with legal action if it continues to collect fees even though the coronavirus has prevented them from using the space.

In a letter to WeWork’s general counsel on Thursday, an attorney for the members said WeWork’s collection of fees was “unlawful” because state and local authorities have directed nonessential personnel to stay home. It is also “hypocritical,” said the attorney, Jim Walden, since WeWork itself has reportedly failed to pay its own rent at some locations.

The members are from New York, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C., where stay-at-home orders are still being enforced.

“Our clients have no legal obligation to pay their membership fees while the purpose of their membership agreements remains frustrated by the Covid-19 pandemic,” Walden wrote in the letter, first reported by The Hill.

A spokesperson for WeWork declined to comment.

According to Walden, WeWork members have complied with public health mandates because it is law, and not doing so in some locations carries a steep fine. In some cities, police have shown up at WeWork locations to “clear the premises of anyone disobeying the applicable stay-at-home orders.

Two members represented by Walden’s letter said WeWork’s decision to keep offices open has burdened them with health and economic concerns.

“The idea of bringing this virus home is not what I wanted to do,” said Ray Miller, owner of an L.A.-based management production company. Miller pays $2,000 a month for three two-person offices that his team is not using.

“It is a financial burden,” said Lisa Kaneff, a freelance copywriter in Washington. She pays $450 a month for a desk that’s situated within three feet of others. “As a freelancer, I’m my only source of income. WeWork is my overhead. I need every penny I can get.”

Although Miller said his team’s space is less dense than Kaneff’s, he is concerned about communal spaces like the kitchen, waiting areas, conference rooms and even elevators. “The whole concept of co-working is that you’re sharing certain spaces,” he said. “I don’t think the space should be open, quite frankly.”

WeWork has kept its U.S. locations open on the grounds that some members operate “essential businesses.” The company has also said its mail service spares it from executive orders such as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s ban on going to work.

The co-working sector has faced unique pressure to balance low revenue with the need of members. As The Real Deal previously reported, Bond Collective has refused to refund membership, although it is pausing membership and discounting fees for members who need relief.

In the letter, Walden accused WeWork of garnishing fees from some members’ bank accounts without permission. It also called the policy “hypocritical,” citing reports that WeWork didn’t pay its full rent in April.

In recent weeks, angry WeWork members have organized petitions and created YouTube videos to compel the company to change its policy.

The post “Unlawful” and “hypocritical”: WeWork members threaten legal action over fees appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 07 May 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Behind Brookfield’s critical Covid moment →← Cushman’s income drops 70% in Q1
  • Recent Posts

    • Heather and Terry Dubrow land $17M for Beverly Hills manse August 12, 2025
    • Unidentified foreign investor grabs 9 burned Malibu lots for $65M August 12, 2025
    • Bankrupt Oceanwide Plaza sale expected to wrap by year’s end: broker August 12, 2025
    • Spec developer’s Brentwood project asking $24M tops LA signed contracts August 12, 2025
    • Pasadena Towers office complex sells to Harbor Associates, Roxborough Group for 50% off August 12, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • August 2025
      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM