• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

TRD Insights: Can CLOs recover from the pandemic?

Hudson Commons and 444 N. Michigan Ave. 
Hudson Commons and 444 N. Michigan Ave.

One of the fastest growing segments of the commercial real estate financing space has been commercial real estate collateralized loan obligations. But the strong growth trajectory for CRE CLOs has been cut short by coronavirus as the broader CMBS market has shut down.

Last year, CRE CLO issuance rose to $22.4 billion across 31 deals, according to a new report from Trepp. That was a 26-percent increase from the $17.7 billion across 21 transactions in 2018, which in turn was more than double the total from 2017.

Like its effect on the broader economy, Covid-19’s impact on CRE CLOs has been swift and massive.

“While it is unclear how quickly the CRE CLO market will fully rebound given the unique challenges currently facing the market, it is hard to imagine lenders providing capital for transitional hotel or retail properties in meaningful numbers anytime soon,” the Trepp report observes.

“Considering the unpredictable nature of the current market disruption and that the sector will need time to find its footing, we could potentially see overall issuance volume decline 40% or more from last year’s impressive total.”

Before coronavirus, the first two months of 2020 saw the issuance of four new deals totalling $3.5 billion. The largest of these was Blackstone Group’s $1.5 billion BXMT 2020-FL2 from February, which included portions of massive loans the firm had provided last year on properties like Industry City and Hudson Commons in New York, and 444 North Michigan Avenue in Chicago.

Compared to CMBS conduit loans with 10-year terms, CRE CLOs are often riskier mortgages, such as bridge or transitional loans, with a term of two to three years and one- to two-year extension options. The average coupon on a CRE CLO last year was 160 basis points above the average borrowing rate on 2019’s average CMBS conduit loan, according to the Trepp report.

CRE CLOs that exist today are a revamped version of the “collateralized debt obligations” that became notorious for their role in the 2008 financial crisis.

Unlike that crisis, when the CMBS market went 21 months without a single new deal, current market conditions may allow for a quicker recovery. “Capital is still plentiful and investors are still actively looking for yield as evidenced by the reception of the recently-priced deals,” the report says, noting that two new CRE CLOs totalling more than $1 billion have already hit the market in May and June.

Meanwhile, existing CRE CLOs in struggling sectors like lodging and retail have taken a big hit from the crisis, and more than 6 percent of loans on such properties have been transferred to special servicing.

The post TRD Insights: Can CLOs recover from the pandemic? appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 15 June 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Dean Koontz fan buys author’s Orange County mansion for $50M →← Hotels are reopening. Will anyone come?
  • Recent Posts

    • Pasadena Office Tower loses more than half its value in a decade, worth less than debt tied to it July 12, 2025
    • Newsom: Eaton Fire utility lawsuits could stretch already “stressed” California Wildfire Fund July 12, 2025
    • DTLA’s One California Plaza value plummets 74%, lands in foreclosure July 11, 2025
    • Los Angeles city planners give blessing to DTLA mixed-use complex July 11, 2025
    • Residential Movers & Shakers: Brian Sperry shuffles from Coldwell Banker to Compass July 11, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM