• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Realogy settled part of its $400M Cartus lawsuit. Now what?

Thomas Oberdorf, CEO of Sirva, and Ryan Schneider, CEO & President of Realogy (Credit: Jhila Farzaneh)

Realogy settled part of its lawsuit over the aborted $400 million sale of its relocation business.

In a regulatory filing, the brokerage conglomerate said it entered a “confidential settlement agreement” with would-be buyer Sirva Worldwide and its parent company, Madison Dearborn Partners, regarding the sale of its relocation business, Cartus. The two sides have come to terms on the termination fee related to the purchase and sale agreement, according to sources.

A spokesperson for Realogy declined to comment beyond the regulatory filing, which doesn’t indicate whether the brokerage will pursue other legal remedies to force the sale.

Realogy and Sirva announced the deal involving Cartus in November 2019. Realogy said at the time that it planned to use proceeds to pay down more than $3 billion in corporate debt. The firm is the parent company of Sotheby’s International Realty, Coldwell Banker and the Corcoran Group.

Read more

  • Realogy sues to enforce $400M Cartus deal
  • Realogy to sell Cartus, pay down $3.5B debt
  • Reology’s 2019 revenue slides to $5.6B

But the agreement fell apart when the fallout from Covid became clear. Sirva and MDP backed out of the transaction in April on the grounds that the pandemic had a “devastating” impact on Cartus. It further alleged Realogy was flirting with “insolvency,” which would make it impossible to close the deal. In Realogy’s August lawsuit, filed in Delaware Chancery Court, the company accused Sirva and MDS of buyer’s remorse, and say they made “false claims in an attempt to avoid their obligations under the purchase agreement.”

But on July 17, the court dismissed the suit. Realogy later appealed, asking the state’s top court to revive part of its lawsuit to compel the sale. In an August 7 letter, the lower court judge urged higher-ups to wait.

Representatives of Sirva did not immediately comment. But in a statement after the July 17 ruling, the company said it was pleased with the outcome.

“As the court concluded, Realogy — not Sirva — caused the transaction to fail,” the company said.

Like other players in residential brokerage, Realogy began cutting expenses in March. It slashed marketing expenses and executive pay and shortened employee workweeks.

Last week, Realogy said it lost $14 million during the second quarter, compared to net income of $69 million during the same period last year. Realogy also said revenue fell 25 percent to $1.2 billion.

In 2019, Realogy reduced its net debt by $78 million. CEO Ryan Schneider said at the time that selling Cartus meant the company was “divesting a non-core, very complex business.”

The post Realogy settled part of its $400M Cartus lawsuit. Now what? appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 11 August 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Here’s the real estate record for Kamala Harris →← Simon Cowell’s got talent for off-market home deals
  • Recent Posts

    • Tech firm backed by Kimco, Nuveen looks to shatter “one-size-fits-all” leasing May 18, 2025
    • CA Insurance Commissioner: “nothing is off the table” in resolving statewide crisis May 17, 2025
    • Elon Musk’s Tesla re-ups Santa Monica industrial lease May 17, 2025
    • Army Corps’ Altadena home debris removal nearly half complete May 16, 2025
    • DTLA adds 500 apartments, brings resi occupancy to 91% May 16, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM