• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Allegations fly in trial over Anbang and Mirae’s $5.8B hotel deal

Ken TaeHern Kim, Zhongyuan Li and the Hyatt Regency Waikiki Beach (Linkedin, Google Maps)
Ken TaeHern Kim, Zhongyuan Li and the Hyatt Regency Waikiki Beach (Linkedin, Google Maps)

The embittered parties fighting over a $5.8 billion hotel portfolio sale went to trial this week to decide the matter.

The deal for 15 American hotels, which was supposed to close April 17, unraveled with the U.S. economy. It was further complicated by an 11th-hour revelation of legal challenges of the hotels’ ownership.

The seller, Anbang, and the buyer, South Korean asset manager Mirae Asset Global Investments, both sued for breach of contract. A Delaware judge will now decide whether the contract should be enforced.

Anbang alleged Mirae is trying to get out of the deal because the pandemic has devastated the hospitality industry and because Mirae’s parent fears Korean regulators are scrutinizing foreign real estate investments.

Mirae responded in kind, claiming Anbang’s lead dealmaker buried his head in the sand as the commercial mortgage-backed securities market seized up and resorted to “absurd” tactics to force Mirae to close the deal.

The trial has revealed unexpected details about the blockbuster deal, such as Mirae’s alleged plan to sell three of its luxury hotels and a last-minute game of hardball in which Anbang tried to get another $1 billion while Mirae demanded a $2 billion discount.

Read more

  • Buyer’s remorse?: How Anbang’s $5.8B hotel deal went sideways
  • Anbang’s $5.8B hotel portfolio sale scrapped
  • Bizarre case of deed fraud complicated Anbang’s $5.8B hotel portfolio deal

The trial, conducted remotely, ended Friday after five days before the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware.

Anbang’s lead litigator, Adam Offenhartz of Gibson Dunn, argued that Mirae had been concerned Korean regulators would begin monitoring its overseas real estate unless it sold the Four Seasons Hotel Sydney in Australia, Fairmont San Francisco and the Hyatt Regency Waikiki Beach Resort and Spa in Hawaii.

Mirae’s head of global acquisitions, Ken TaeHern Kim, initially denied that Mirae was worried about that, but ultimately admitted that “someone’s concerned” about Mirae’s overseas investments. He also testified Mirae had no current plans to sell the hotels and only briefly shopped the Hawaii resort around.

Kim also testified that Anbang tried to play hardball as he pieced together financing for the deal — despite late word of litigation over ownership of the hotels Mirae was about to purchase.

He claimed that Anbang’s lead dealmaker, Zhongyuan Li, offered him a three-month extension if Mirae doubled its deposit, waived its rights to property-condition reports and paid nearly $400 million in Anbang’s funding costs.

Kim called the conditions “absurd” and offensive. In response, Kim said he would chop at least $2 billion off the price or put the deal on ice until the hotel market recovered.

“[That] was me trying to tell [Li]: ‘Wake up. This is really something serious. The magnitude of the problem is not small. So, come to your senses, we need more time,’” he testified.

Mirae also claimed Anbang withheld information and downplayed the seriousness of trademark disputes involving the Strategic Hotels & Resorts portfolio by dismissing them as the work of “a 20-year-old Uber driver with a criminal record.”

These disputes stopped the deal a year ago, though both Kim and Li testified that it might have closed in September 2019 if Anbang had agreed to either hold the cash value of the hotels in escrow or issue a line of credit equal to the value of the six hotels known to be part of the trademark scheme.

Anbang insists the trademark litigants are fraudsters. On the stand, Li called the parties’ claims to Anbang’s assets “crazy” and said the insurer sold Vancouver’s Bentall Center, to which the alleged fraudsters lay claim, to the Blackstone Group and Hudson Pacific Properties last year without a problem.

A Delaware court dismissed the ownership claims to Anbang’s hotels, but the decision is being appealed.

At least one person behind those claims has stepped forward: a former journalist named Zhao Yan.

Zhao this month told Bloomberg — which identified him as an officer of one of the entities — that the claims on the hotels are part of an effort to “defend private property against wrongful taking by the Chinese government.”

Mirae’s lead litigator, Michael Carlinsky, argued that the claims on the hotels could be connected to former Anbang chairman Wu Xiaohui, who was jailed in 2018 for economic crimes, or other parties. Carlinsky, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, raised the Bloomberg story and Zhao during his examination of Li.

The judge hearing the case, J. Travis Laster, is expected to deliver a verdict this fall.

Write to Erin Hudson at ekh@therealdeal.com

The post Allegations fly in trial over Anbang and Mirae’s $5.8B hotel deal appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 31 August 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Grand ambitions: Related’s DTLA megaproject hits halfway mark →← Justin Bieber, Hailey Baldwin upgrade to $26M manse in Beverly Park
  • Recent Posts

    • Resi occupancy soars above pre-pandemic levels in Downtown LA May 22, 2025
    • Hines gets key approval on Arts District office project May 22, 2025
    • Construction doesn’t scare off buyer of $32M Bel-Air manse May 22, 2025
    • Damavandi’s Santa Monica resi plan gains weight May 22, 2025
    • Los Angeles hotel executives warn distress to follow wage hike May 22, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM