• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Lawsuits against Cushman & Wakefield target appraisers’ pay

Cushman and Wakefield CEO Brett White (Getty; iStock; Cushman and Wakefield)
Cushman and Wakefield CEO Brett White (Getty; iStock; Cushman and Wakefield)

Dimitri Dixon has done appraisals for Cushman & Wakefield since 2007, but unlike most workers, she ended up in debt to her employer.

Under the firm’s pay structure, the appraiser receives a loan, known as a recoverable draw. When she finishes, the company deducts from the loan balance any fees she incurred. If the fees exceed the advance, the employee is paid the difference. But sometimes the fees are less than the draw and the employee ends up owing the firm.

Dixon was in debt to Cushman & Wakefield for all 11 years she worked there, according to a class-action lawsuit she filed against the company in California.

In 2017 — 10 years into her employment — the firm held a promissory note against her for $54,000, “equal to the total bi-monthly draw payments received throughout the year,” the case reads.

Although the amount was eventually reduced, when Dixon was fired in 2018, she still owed $15,632.

Dixon is not the only appraiser to take issue with Cushman & Wakefield over its pay practices. At least three separate class-action lawsuits filed against Cushman & Wakefield last year, in Colorado, California and Washington, D.C., make such complaints.

Read more

  • DOJ accuses Staten Island broker of housing discrimination
  • Appraisers rethink how to value a property during Covid
  • Real estate attorneys predict bottleneck, brain drain after court cuts

“I don’t know [what] is a driver of how they came to be filed at the same time,” said Deirdre Aaron, partner at Outten & Golden involved in the D.C. case. ”But I do certainly think that shows this was not just the instance with our client. There’s certainly other appraisers out there who are feeling the same issues.”

Cushman & Wakefield refused to comment, citing ongoing litigation.

The appraisers in the D.C. case do not work under the same recoverable draw structure that Dixon did. Their lawsuit alleges appraisers, because of how they were classified by Cushman & Wakefield, did not receive overtime pay despite working more than 40 hours a week and sometimes more than 60.

“Working overtime was a routine and necessary part of my job,” appraiser Katherine Pierno said in a declaration filed in the case. “I could not complete all of my required job duties in a 40-hour workweek, and my supervisor often encouraged me to work long hours and on weekends in order to meet deadlines.”

As non-salaried employees, the appraisers should have gotten compensation, their lawsuit says.

“Our main argument is that our client and other junior appraisers were not doing the type of sophisticated work that would render them exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act,” Aaron said.

Cushman & Wakefield has employed more than 400 appraisers who were paid in a similar manner, according to the lawsuits.

The post Lawsuits against Cushman & Wakefield target appraisers’ pay appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 05 October 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Think you know celebrity real estate? →← “Schitt’s Creek” hotel hits market after Primetime Emmy sweep
  • Recent Posts

    • State Farm approved for 17% rate hike amid California “insurance crisis” May 13, 2025
    • Optimus scores $22M refinancing for South LA shopping center May 13, 2025
    • Landmark, Stockbridge drop $100M for student housing properties near USC May 13, 2025
    • Late philanthropist couple’s Bel-Air manse listed for $35M goes into contract May 13, 2025
    • Apollo’s $1.2B buyout takes Landsea Homes private May 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM