• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Huizar and LA developer deny charges in pay-to-play scheme

Jose Huizar and Raymond Chan (Getty, U.S. Department of Justice)
Jose Huizar and Raymond Chan (Getty, U.S. Department of Justice)

Disgraced former Los Angeles City Council member Jose Huizar intends to fight the government’s sprawling corruption case against him, as does a real estate developer, his company and a former top city official implicated in the alleged pay-to-play scheme.

On Monday, Huizar, developer Dae Yong Lee and his company entered not guilty pleas in federal court in L.A., the U.S. attorney’s office said. Huizar’s plea came first; he denied the government’s 34-count criminal complaint against him, the government said. The appearances were all made through video hookup.

Former L.A. Deputy Mayor for Economic Development Raymond Chan also pleaded not guilty to related charges that included racketeering and bribery. The government accuses Huizar and his associates of accepting cash bribes and other payoffs from the developers who sought favorable treatment on real estate projects.

While representatives for Lee’s 940 Hill LLC also entered a formal not guilty plea for the company, still to be arraigned are China-based development firm Shenzhen New World Group and its chairman, Wei Huang.

Lee, Huang, their companies and Chan were indicted Nov. 30.

Huang, who has a residence in San Marino but is now in China, is scheduled to surrender to authorities next week. A warrant had been issued for his arrest.

Huizar’s criminal trial is scheduled for June 22. Trial dates for the other defendants have not been set. Lee and 940 Hill LLC have another court date scheduled for Tuesday.

Following a two-year probe, the U.S. Attorney’s office in June charged Huizar with running what it called a money-making criminal enterprise through his role as chairman of the Council’s planning and land use management committee. Huizar allegedly solicited roughly $1.5 million in bribes from developers who sought to build projects in Huizar’s downtown district.

Huizar allegedly used some of the payoff to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit, and received Katy Perry concert tickets, according to federal prosecutors.

Besides Shenzhen New World and 940 Hill, developers implicated in the case include Shenzhen Hazens and San Francisco-based Carmel Partners. China-based Shenzhen Hazens admitted wrongdoing in October, and agreed to pay a $1 million fine to avoid prosecution. Carmel Partners has not been charged.

Chan, meanwhile, is accused of funneling bribe money from Shenzhen New World to Huizar to help the developer’s planned 77-story DTLA tower project get passed.

Lee, a Bel Air-based developer, and the LLC he incorporated, allegedly provided Huizar $500,000 in order to quell labor opposition to a 20-story tower he wanted to develop in Huizar’s district.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Huizar and LA developer deny charges in pay-to-play scheme appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 07 December 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Breaking away: 3 counties look part from SoCal stay-at-home order →← Developer plans 75-unit affordable complex in Pico-Union
  • Recent Posts

    • Reality TV personalities Heidi Montag, Spencer Pratt can’t afford to rebuild Palisades home May 19, 2025
    • Historic Fairfax Theatre looks for buyer to drop $45M May 19, 2025
    • Developers sue Beverly Hills after builder’s remedy applications denied May 19, 2025
    • Construction, gridlock don’t stop retail players from getting to ICSC Las Vegas May 19, 2025
    • Celebrity restaurants at hotels drive up average room rates, revenue May 19, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM