• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Landlords sue Santa Monica over “arbitrary” ban on short-term rentals

Neil Shekhter of NMS Properties, who is involved in the lawsuit. (Kevin Scanlon)
Neil Shekhter of NMS Properties, who is involved in the lawsuit. (Kevin Scanlon)
 

A slew of apartment landlords are suing the City of Santa Monica, claiming a law that bans short-term rentals is “arbitrary, capricious, and lacking in evidentiary support.”

The property owners behind 32 limited liability companies filed the lawsuit, which seeks to toss a measure the Santa Monica City Council passed in September. Those firms include Scott Walter’s WS Communities — which is building 850 rental units in the city —  and Neil Shekhter’s NMS Properties.

Under the law, the seaside town of 91,000 people now requires that residential leases last a minimum of one year. Also, landlords cannot rent out furnished apartments.

Filed on Monday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the lawsuit paints a picture of once-powerful property owners who now feel blindsided by local government, and are trying different ways to fight back.

The complaint details the two-year process by the city’s planning department to study a new rent-term measure, partly in response to concerns about the rise of Airbnb and other short-term rentals, many of them unregistered.

Santa Monica officials initially decided against a mandatory long-term lease requirement, according to the lawsuit. But the suit claims the city eventually “bowed to political pressure,” from UNITE HERE, the powerful union that represents hotel workers. The lawsuit says the city then “openly pushed an agenda that solely benefited the hospitality industry.”

How does bowing to political pressure equate with an unlawful statute?

For one, it alleges Santa Monica is violating the California Coastal Act, which puts restrictions on city laws that govern land within 1,000 yards of the Pacific Ocean. The short-term rental law, according to the lawsuit, also violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause because it disproportionately affects tenants hurt by Covid who may be looking for temporary residence near hospitals.

The measure also goes against the property rights of landlords, the lawsuit argues. Because of the pandemic, landlords say they are still collecting far less in rent from tenants in downtown Santa Monica, some up to 25 percent less.

A statement from the city said it has a “successful record adopting balanced housing policies that protect limited housing for long-term residents.” The recent law, the statement continued, is “legally valid,” but officials are “reviewing the challenges raised in the complaint that was recently filed.”

 

The post Landlords sue Santa Monica over “arbitrary” ban on short-term rentals appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 15 December 2020
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  1
Homebuilder confidence drops for first time since April →← Retail magnate Peter Nygard hit with sex-trafficking indictment
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM