• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Hollywood tenants’ lawsuit blitz takes turn for the surreal

(Redwood Urban)
(Redwood Urban)

For the owners of a Hollywood apartment complex, it was a minor legal headache: Three lawsuits by former tenants alleging problems at the property.

That was November. Now there are 25 lawsuits.

The tenants’ cases against Redwood Urban and the previous owner of the 270-unit property at 1724 Highland Avenue make explosive claims — including a literal explosion.

They describe unlivable conditions and illegal short-term rentals that led to thefts, break-ins and “physical intimidation at the hands of intruders.”

On closer inspection, however, these separate lawsuits — mostly filed in the name of individual tenants — contain oddly identical allegations. For example, three-quarters of them claim to have had the same run-in with a malfunctioning parking lot gate.

“In one incident, Plaintiff’s wife almost died in a medical emergency because the gate would not open in the midst of their effort to seek medical attention,” 19 of the 25 lawsuits say. Not one of the wives appears to have sued.

In a statement, lawyers for Redwood said the “sloppy, copy-and-paste” nature of the complaints support the company’s view that they are all “meritless.”

Read more
  • Brooklyn lawyer charged in $4M real estate scheme
  • Feds indict NY real estate exec in $50M fraud
  • Fake real estate agents are scamming New Yorkers

Of the 25 lawsuits examined, 24 were filed between August and January by one attorney — Daniel Lavi of The Tenants Law Firm. The other, filed on behalf of two tenants in March by San Francisco-based Tenants Law Group, mentions “physical altercations with drunk Airbnb guests” and inadequate upkeep, but no wife-related emergencies. Neither law firm responded to requests for comment.

Lavi’s 24 suits all say a December 2017 “explosion” created debris and caused the L.A. Fire Department to evacuate the building in case of a gas leak. The suits assert that the tenants were allowed back in after a few hours without a thorough inspection of the property.

Redwood’s lawyers called the Tenants Law Firm’s filing of 24 separate suits, instead of one with all the plaintiffs, “an obvious tactic to drive up litigation costs to use as leverage against the insurance company in any potential future settlement negotiations.”

“These types of habitability lawsuits against apartments have become a popular endeavor among plaintiff attorneys who seek the low-hanging fruit of insurance money,” Sean Smith of G&P Schick wrote in Redwood’s statement.

The attorneys recruit as many tenants as possible for a “habitability case,” then seek an early settlement, he said.

In some of the later lawsuits, tenants’ claims against the complex’s previous owner, Essex Property Trust, have been dropped.

Read more
  • Lawsuits allege Airbnb guests ran rampant at Hollywood apartment complex
  • Jefferson at Hollywood apartment complex sells for $132M

Built in 2010 just steps from the Chinese Theater on Hollywood Boulevard, the Highland Avenue complex has 243 market-rate and 27 income-restricted units, 8,670 square feet of retail and two billboards.

Most of the plaintiffs moved in between 2012 and 2016 — when Essex was still the owner — and paid rent ranging from $1,800 to $3,036. Two living in the affordable units arrived in 2010 and paid less than $1,000 a month.

While most of the lawsuits filed in late December and January are veritable carbon copies, apart from lease-related details, the earlier lawsuits have more varied allegations.

In two suits filed in November and early December, tenants allege that “infestations of ants, gnats and other vermin” were common at the property, a claim that does not appear in later suits. In another early December suit, a couple alleges that their 5-year old “suffered medical issues arising from staying in the building.”

The earlier suits offer more detail on tenants’ circumstances. In a November complaint, one alleges that she faced discrimination because of her protected status as a recipient of public housing assistance, and faced harassment from building staff. And in the earliest tenant lawsuit, filed in August, a transgender tenant claims to have been wrongfully evicted while going through medical treatment.

The claim that a wife nearly died because of a gate malfunction first appeared in four suits filed Dec. 3.

“The allegations in some of the suits have no basis in fact whatsoever,” Redwood said in its statement.

Curb appeal

The lawsuits’ portrayal of the complex does not quite square with the assessments of ratings agencies that gauged its ability to repay debt.

In February, the landlord refinanced the apartment complex with $90 million from MF1 Capital, a multifamily mortgage REIT focused on bridge loans and backed by CBRE Capital Markets, Limekiln Real Estate and Berkshire Group.

That loan was securitized, and as part of the process, several ratings agencies looked at the property’s finances and recent history. The picture they paint is not the disaster depicted by the lawsuits, but does reflect some complications.

“There have been several challenges and disruptions to leasing over the past few years, including unknowingly inheriting 80 Airbnb tenants at acquisition from the previous owner, ongoing renovations to the units and common areas, and, most recently, coronavirus-related restrictions,” a DBRS Morningstar analysis notes.

The landlord’s statement addressed the Airbnb issue, saying, “Redwood has never permitted short-term rentals on the property and, in fact, has always unequivocally and expressly prohibited [them].”

It also pointed out an irony of tenants’ complaints: Some were evicted by Redwood for “illegally subleasing their units as short-term rentals.”

Fitch reported that the Airbnb tenants were removed, but units remained vacant for longer than expected because contractors were not available to fix them up. Facade and exterior renovations also delayed lease-up of the property.

DBRS analysts toured the property and concluded that “the updated units and amenities showed well but do not directly compete with the newer Class A product in the submarket.”

Of the complex’s two retail spaces, one is vacant and the other has yet to be occupied by its tenant, Mayweather Boxing + Fitness, because the pandemic delayed the buildout. But DBRS said the spaces’ curb appeal and exposure to foot traffic bode well.

Redwood, in a joint venture with Beverly Pacific, the investment company of Guess co-founders Paul and Maurice Marciano, has spent more than $7 million renovating 212 of the building’s 243 market-rate units and is planning to do the rest as they become available, according to ratings documents.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Hollywood tenants’ lawsuit blitz takes turn for the surreal appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 22 April 2021
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
There’s “lots of runway in real estate”: Blackstone’s Jon Gray →← Kushner Companies sells two Maryland apartment complexes for $240M
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM