• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

NY tax officials crack down on remote workers

Non-New York residents who worked remotely last year will still have to pay New York taxes. (iStock)
Working from an out-of-state home does not mean you can skip paying New York taxes. (iStock)

Tax officials in New York state are taking a closer look at the refund claims of folks who traded a desk in New York for their out-of-state home office.

The “convenience rule” is what’s in question, according to the Wall Street Journal. New York state taxes the money that nonresident workers draw from in-state sources, including the income that commuters make when they choose to work from home.

But this year, some telecommuters have challenged the rule, claiming that they didn’t choose to work outside the state, according to the report. Rather, they were forced to by the pandemic, and paid income taxes in their home state accordingly.

Read more
  • Escaping New York? Tax man is right behind you
  • NYC to city workers: Come back to the office
  • Tech workers plan to head back to offices by Q3

Mark Klein, chairman of the law firm Hodgson Russ, told the publication that filers have a strong argument to claim their decision to work from home wasn’t one of convenience, but of necessity.

In October, the state Department of Taxation and Finance said nonresidents whose primary office is in New York should consider dates of remote work as in-state work. If they choose to file a claim in their home state, they’ll need to prove that their employer established an office in that state, Darren Dopp, a tax department spokesperson, told the Journal.

New York courts have upheld the convenience rule twice, in 2003 and 2004. And federal courts have ruled that states can tax nonresidents’ income when employees have a substantial link to the state doing the taxing.

Most cases on the pandemic-era tax rules between states are still pending, such as a suit filed by New Hampshire in the U.S. Supreme Court that accused Massachusetts of unconstitutionally taxing New Hampshire’s telecommuting residents. Over a dozen states, including New Jersey and Connecticut, have submitted briefs on the issue.

[WSJ] — Suzannah Cavanaugh

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post NY tax officials crack down on remote workers appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 07 May 2021
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Serious buyers only: The 10 priciest new Hamptons listings →← In (LA) theaters now: More people
  • Recent Posts

    • USC saves view of LA Coliseum sign after clash with developer, city May 15, 2025
    • Tesla re-ups lease of 82K sf Santa Monica service center May 15, 2025
    • Hotel designer asks $99K per month for Santa Monica beach pad May 15, 2025
    • Feds to sell landmark Spring Street Courthouse in DTLA May 14, 2025
    • Rams owner Stan Kroenke eyes Olympics broadcast center, film studio in Inglewood May 14, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM