• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Engineer raised red flags more than 2 years before Surfside condo collapsed

The 12-story condo tower. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

UPDATED, June 26, 8:21 p.m.: A 2018 report raised major red flags about the structural integrity of the Champlain Towers South, the Surfside condo building that partially collapsed this week, killing at least five and trapping another 156.

The engineer tasked to survey the building for its 40-year recertification found “abundant concrete cracking and spalling” as well as failed waterproofing below the pool deck that was causing “major structural damage” to the slab below the deck, entrance drive and planters, according to the report, which was made publicly available by the town of Surfside late Friday night. (For the full report, click here.)

In engineer Frank Morabito’s structural field survey report, dated October 2018, he wrote that the reinforced concrete slab that is not sloped downward to drain water was a “major error” in the original design of the building at 8777 Collins Avenue. Morabito points to original building plans prepared by William M. Friedman & Associates Architects and Breiterman Jurado & Associates, Consulting Engineers.

Images from a report submitted to the town of Surfside
Images from a report submitted to the town of Surfside

The northeast portion of the 12-story building closest to the pool deck – and the ocean – crumbled at about 1:30 a.m. Thursday morning. As of Saturday, officials said 130 were accounted for, as rescue efforts continued . A civil lawsuit was filed late Thursday by a unit owner who was not at the building at the time, seeking more than $5 million in damages for victims of the collapse.

The condo association’s lawyer, Donna Berger, told The Real Deal that the repairs were being paid for with a $12 million line of credit and an $8,000-per-unit special assessment for the new roof. The association had put out bids for concrete restoration work but had not begun construction.

The 2018 report found that due to the flat design, water was pooling instead of draining.

Until now, the most damning report released since the collapse was a Florida International University study that concluded last year that the Champlain Towers South had been sinking at about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s, although the rate may have changed since then.

Read more
  • Details emerge in search for cause of fatal Surfside condo collapse
  • Surfside rescue mission frustrates condo victims’ loved ones
  • Here’s what we know about the Surfside condo collapse
  • Photos: Devastation at Champlain Towers South

Morabito’s report stated that replacement of the waterproofing on the existing deck would be “extremely expensive” and would be a “major disturbance” to residents and guests in the building, but called it a “systemic issue” for the structure.

Morabito also submitted another report to the town at 5:35 p.m. Thursday that pointed mainly to cracking and spalling at the plaza and pool. The report, which the town labeled as “unverified” and not officially allowed by the condo association, describes findings from an inspection completed from August to September 2018.

Prior to that, there were concrete patching and epoxy injections, which repair cracks, to the concrete slab that supports the pool and plaza above the garage – but it was “performed less than satisfactorily and needs to be completed again,” according to the report.

Parts of the outside masonry also had spalling and cracking, allowing water to penetrate inside the wall, with Morabito recommending repairs. Concrete under the pool showed signs of rebar corrosion, he added in the report.

Morabito determined that 2 percent of outside concrete columns had spalling and 8 percent of the garage and plaza slabs had concrete deterioration, mostly under or near the pool.

For this report, Morabito inspected 68 Champlain Towers South units, determining 3 percent had drywall cracking, although he went on to say this was not a structural issue.

It’s unclear if the problems identified in the report submitted on Thursday were completed. Only one recent notice of commencement shows work had started for the recertification: the re-roof, which began in April.

This story has been updated to reflect the second report was filed after the collapse. 

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Engineer raised red flags more than 2 years before Surfside condo collapsed appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 26 June 2021
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
This house sale is no shell game →← Hong Kong housing prices race toward record highs
  • Recent Posts

    • Terreno Realty nabs Orange County Home Depot for $50M June 24, 2025
    • Case Study 2.0 aims for swift Palisades, Altadena rebuild minus “cookie-cutter” look June 24, 2025
    • MG Properties drops $144M for Anaheim apartment complex June 24, 2025
    • Affinius Capital injects $55M investment into Latigo Group housing plans June 24, 2025
    • LA City Council rescinds Hollywood hotel approval after legal defeat June 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM