• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Zestimate: These two Zillow iBuying lawsuits won’t be the last

Illustration of Zillow CEO Richard Barton (Getty, iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
Illustration of Zillow CEO Richard Barton (Getty, iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)

Zillow is facing two class-action suits for allegedly misleading investors and failing to inform them in a timely manner about the struggles of its iBuying business.

More lawsuits may be forthcoming as Zillow does damage control in the wake of closing Zillow Offers, through which it used a proprietary algorithm to buy and sell thousands of homes. The company shuttered its iBuying business in early November just after apparently pausing it. It laid off a quarter of its staff as it canceled Zillow Offers, citing the unreliability of its model for forecasting home prices.

“Put simply, our observed error rate has been far more volatile than we ever expected possible, and makes us look far more like a leveraged housing trader than the market maker we set out to be,” Zillow CEO Rich Barton said at the time.

It’s not clear that its real-time pricing was accurate either, as accusations flew that Zillow was overpaying for homes.

The federal lawsuits, filed Nov. 16 and Nov. 19 in Seattle, are similar, and both seek class-action status on behalf of shareholders who acquired the stock between Feb. 10 and Nov. 2.

Read more
  • Compass shares drop below $10, another all-time low
  • American Homes 4 Rent eyes Zillow flop on flips
  • Humans vs machines: The fallout from Zillow’s iBuying fiasco

Both lawsuits accuse the company of drumming up positive sentiment about its iBuying activities with “materially false and/or misleading statements” in the months before it closed the operation, and of failing to disclose “material adverse facts” surrounding them.

The suits name co-founder and CEO Richard Barton, CFO Allen Parker and COO Jeremy Wacksman as defendants alongside the company.

“We are aware of the lawsuit filed yesterday and are currently reviewing it. As a general practice, we do not discuss pending litigation,” a Zillow spokesperson said by email.

Zillow’s stock price has fallen by nearly 50% since late October, when it first revealed the challenges within its iBuying business. It is common for shareholders to seek redress after a public company’s stock falls steeply in value.

Zillow’s board of directors made the decision to “wind down” Zillow Offers “in light of home pricing unpredictability, capacity constraints and other operational challenges faced by Zillow Offers that were exacerbated by an unprecedented housing market, a global pandemic and a difficult labor and supply chain environment,” the company said in a third-quarter filing.

Attorneys representing the lead plaintiffs for the two lawsuits, Dibakar Barua and Steven Silverberg, could not be reached for comment.

Earlier this month, New York City-based Pretium Partners inked a deal for 2,000 of the nearly 10,000 homes Zillow acquired through its iBuying activities for an undisclosed price.

Zillow has said it will sell the rest to all types of buyers, from individuals to institutional investors.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Zestimate: These two Zillow iBuying lawsuits won’t be the last appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 22 November 2021
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Affordable housing investor sells Pasadena complex for $223M →← Now streaming: TRD’s podcast Deconstruct on what’s next for Surfside
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM