• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

These retailers fell behind on rent last year

Retailers are falling behind on their rent (Stock, Photo illustration by Priyanka Modi)

The pandemic has all but ceased to be an excuse for retailers to skip rent.

Collections from national tenants last year were at 94 percent, on par with 2019’s 96 percent, according to a report by Datex Property Solutions. Collections from non-national tenants were 85 percent, down three points from 2019.

The chain stores in Datex’s survey all lease 10 or more locations or have a minimum gross monthly rent of $250,000. The report does not account for any rent relief from landlords.

Despite the high overall rate of collection, some tenants were exceptions.

Cinepolis, for example, made just 25 percent of rent payments last year and Regal Cinemas just 54 percent. Movie theaters on the whole paid just 66 percent of what they owed compared to nearly 100 percent in 2019. The missed payments reflect a second brutal year for movie houses, which saw attendance plunge as in-home streaming soared.

Read more
  • Retail rent collections rebound to 90%
  • Manhattan’s retail market ticks up toward rebound
  • These were Manhattan’s largest retail leases of 2021

Cinemas also saw gross rent as a portion of sales skyrocket from 16 percent in 2019 to 49 percent in 2021, as sales per square foot nose-dived from $144 to $55.

“Sales is like oxygen. The more sales I have, the more opportunity I have to breathe, but ultimately I have costs that eat away at those sales,” Datex Property Solutions CEO Mark Sigal said.

Fitness centers also had a down year as customers turned to at-home or outdoor workouts to avoid Covid and mask policies. Boca Raton-based chain Orangetheory Fitness made 73 percent of payments while LA Fitness paid 87 percent. Overall, fitness providers were at 85 percent, compared to 94 percent in a normal year.

Though department stores managed to pay their rent — with the category at 96 percent — their occupancy costs rose from 3 percent of sales in 2019 to 8 percent last year. Again, that was not because rent went up but because sales per square foot plunged, from $281 to $183.

Others withheld rent for no obvious reason, including Victoria’s Secret, which made just 74 percent of its payments, and Sephora, which made 84 percent of them.

As 2021 progressed, some retailers improved on payments as sales improved. In the first quarter, hair salons saw sales per square foot fall from $265 to $196. However, by the fourth quarter, sales per square foot were up $10 to $271. As a result, collections went from 79 percent in the first quarter to 97 percent in the fourth.

Some retailer categories had a great 2021, even beating out 2019’s numbers. Home goods, for example, saw occupancy costs drop from 9 percent of sales to 7 percent as sales per square foot jumped from $245 to $491. Sporting goods and supermarkets similarly saw improvement.

Forty-seven percent of new leases last year included rent hikes, with those rents rising by an average of 17 percent above 2019 levels. Another 28 percent saw decreases in rent, averaging 15 percent. Renewal rates were up compared with before the pandemic, with 64 percent of those who could renew doing so, up from 59 percent in 2019.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post These retailers fell behind on rent last year appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 26 January 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Sam Zell’s Equity Lifestyle Properties invests $147M in manufactured homes →← Amazon to open 202K sf warehouse in East LA
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM