• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Santa Fe Springs approves condo project over residents’ objections

The current property at 11733 Florence Avenue (LoopNet, iStock/Photo Illustration by Steven Dilakian for The Real Deal)

Irvine-based Melia Homes was given the go-ahead to build 54 condominiums in a controversial development to replace a shuttered Mormon church in Santa Fe Springs.

The Santa Fe Springs City Council voted to approve zoning and general plan changes allowing the multiple-residential development to move forward at 11733 Florence Ave., the Whittier Daily News reported.

The unanimous vote came despite 180 signatures from opposing homeowners who said they wanted single-family homes built on the three-acre site. The project calls for razing a vacant 18,000 square-foot church and replacing it with 11 buildings containing condominiums.

Santa Fe Springs Councilman Jay Sarno said it wasn’t easy to vote against what residents wanted.

“But we have to realize we are trying to do what’s best for our community as a whole,” Sarno said. “This isn’t easy for us. It just means we have a difference of opinion on where we should head.”

Melia Homes responded to residents by making several changes to make the development a better fit.

It whittled down the number of units from 63 to 54, and opted to put only two-story units, instead of three, on its western side. The developer also increased the number of open parking spots — each unit will have separate a two-car garage — from 22 spaces to 34.

Chad Brown, vice president for planning and development for Melia, said the project is compatible with the area, with two apartment complexes nearby.

Mayor Annette Rodriguez said the city approved the condominiums because they were a good project.

“It will bring new housing options to the City, which is important to our residents,” she said in an email to the newspaper.

Wayne Morrell, director of planning and community development, said few single-family residential projects are being built today.

“You need to go to the Inland Empire or have a large amount of land,” he said.

The opposing neighbors would have none of it. They cited more traffic, collisions and pollution as a result of the high-density condominium project,

Irma Huitron said she plans to go to the next meeting when the zone change must go through a second reading and ask council members to give the reason for their votes.

“Sometimes, it’s hard to say no to a developer,” Huitron said. “Being like every other city is easy. Being different is difficult. Think about how these three acres can be used. All we say yes to are townhomes, condominiums, and apartments. There is no land being set aside for low-density housing.”

[WDN] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Staley Point, Bain spring for beer bash
  • Packaging outfit signs 150K-sf lease in Santa Fe Springs
    E
  • Richman Group pursuing 139-unit affordable complex in Santa Fe Springs

The post Santa Fe Springs approves condo project over residents’ objections appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 10 February 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Caruso sets appointment to plunge into LA race for mayor →← Barry Shy Trims ask on Beverly Hills mansion
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM