• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Laguna Beach ballot measure could require public vote on larger projects

Laguna Beach and Pacific Coast Highway sign (iStock)

Voters in Laguna Beach might get direct say on the biggest developments in the coastal enclave.

A measure on the November ballot would apply to development projects along Pacific Coast Highway and Laguna Canyon Road, letting the public cast a deciding vote when certain conditions are reached for size, parking and traffic, the Orange County Register reported.

A vote would be triggered if a project contains a site larger than 7,500 square feet, a building taller than 36 feet in height, has more than 22,000 square feet of space or may add at least 200 more vehicle trips a day.

The Laguna Beach initiative excludes single-family homes and apartments of less than 10 market-rate units, or those limited to low- to extremely low-income households.

If passed, the city would join the Orange County coastal communities of Newport Beach, Costa Mesa and Dana Point in enacting “greenlight laws” that compel residents to vote on projects that exceed identified thresholds.

The measure was introduced by Laguna Residents First, a political action committee that collected more than 2,000 signatures to place it on the ballot. The group said it wanted more resident input on new, larger-scale developments whose traffic and parking can impact the community and unique look of Laguna Beach.

“Due to the natural limitation of the city’s size, proximity to the beach, the level of developments dictates the need for careful management of further intensification of land use in the city,” the initiative states. “The look and feel of Laguna Beach, including the rural and eclectic Laguna Canyon, walkable commercial districts, tree-lined streets and a variety of low-scale buildings require protection.”

Some council members,however, said they feared the measure could scare off developers from building entertainment and fine dining establishments, would add a greater layer of bureaucracy to the building process, and might come with unintended consequences for the city.

The council directed city staffers to look at a competing ballot measure that might find other ways to address residents’ concerns about scale, height and parking.

“People are concerned we’ll have monolithic developments,” Mayor Sue Kempf said. “The municipal code and the City Council don’t support that type of development. Maybe we can come back with something more palatable.”

A development approval measure passed by Costa Mesa voters in 2016 has resulted in a city struggle to meet state housing requirements. Since then, only one larger-scale development has been proposed, according to the newspaper. A special election for the public vote on the proposal – which the council has approved – has not been scheduled.

[Orange County Register] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Coalition seeks ballot measure to tax home sales of $5M+
  • The fine print: Three California ballot measures that would rock real estate
  • Effort by lawmakers to nix racist law on affordable housing may cost $20M

The post Laguna Beach ballot measure could require public vote on larger projects appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 14 March 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Russian businessman lists Beverly Hills estate for $26M →← Undeveloped chunk of Bel Air re-listed with $10M chop
  • Recent Posts

    • Tech firm backed by Kimco, Nuveen looks to shatter “one-size-fits-all” leasing May 18, 2025
    • CA Insurance Commissioner: “nothing is off the table” in resolving statewide crisis May 17, 2025
    • Elon Musk’s Tesla re-ups Santa Monica industrial lease May 17, 2025
    • Army Corps’ Altadena home debris removal nearly half complete May 16, 2025
    • DTLA adds 500 apartments, brings resi occupancy to 91% May 16, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM