• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Inland Empire city rejects 1.3M sf distribution warehouse proposal

(iStock)

The Inland Empire city of Jurupa Valley has rejected a plan to build a 1.3-million-square-foot logistics warehouse because of its impact on the community.

The Jurupa City Council voted not to approve a proposal by Los Angeles-based Proficiency Rubidoux to build Rubidoux Commerce Park at Avalon and 26th streets, the Riverside Press-Enterprise reported.

The warehouse and industrial building planned for 81 acres next to a former cement plant was expected to generate more than 500 truck trips a day.

“Our main goal,” Mayor Chris Barajas said before the vote, “is to protect our residents.”

The developer is now expected to send a revised proposal to the city’s planning commission for a public hearing.

The warehouse project was planned near a residential neighborhood and less than 500 feet from an approved Emerald Ridge North Residential Project. The City of Jurupa Valley would have needed to change its zoning and general plan to permit logistics on the development site.

The warehouse project, in the planning for five years, was expected to generate more than 520 jobs and give the newly incorporated city west of Riverside $13.2 million, plus annual payments of $200,000.

Concrete screen walls and landscaping would have served as buffers to neighbors.

But Jurupa Valley officials were concerned that the more than 500 truck trips would generate health risks and other negative environmental impacts to the community.

“I have big issues with the size of the building, and the fact we’re going to be adding over 500 truck trips per day, adding to the already poor quality of air quality in that area,” Councilwoman Lorena Barajas Bisbee said. “The negative impacts this project will create, for me, do not outweigh some of the benefits.”

A need for logistics storage for goods shipped into Los Angeles and Long Beach ports has turned the Inland Empire into a warehouse powerhouse. Last year, Riverside and San Bernardino counties ranked third in the nation last year for large warehouse leases.

Between 2004 and 2020, Inland Empire warehouse space doubled to 600 million square feet, the Press-Enterprise reported.

The number of warehouses in San Bernardino County alone increased to 2,998 in 2021, from 203 in 1990, according to an environmental conservancy at Pitzer College in Claremont.

But while the coronavirus pandemic boosted e-commerce growth and demand for instant delivery, such warehouses face growing opposition from residents worried about air pollution, noise and traffic from diesel trucks.

This month, residents in Ontario battling a plan to rezone 220 acres of farmland for industrial use called for a moratorium on distribution warehouses.

[Riverside Press-Enterprise] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Critics want moratorium on warehouses in key Inland Empire city
  • Inland Empire No. 3 in U.S. for large warehouse leases
  • Amazon faces local opposition to warehouse in Chicago’s West Humboldt Park

The post Inland Empire city rejects 1.3M sf distribution warehouse proposal appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 21 March 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo list Pacific Palisades estate for $57M →← TV exec in contract to sell former Harry Warner estate
  • Recent Posts

    • Feds to sell landmark Spring Street Courthouse in DTLA May 14, 2025
    • Rams owner Stan Kroenke eyes Olympics broadcast center, film studio in Inglewood May 14, 2025
    • Eaton fire victims, others claim insurance adjuster stole repair money  May 14, 2025
    • State Farm approved for 17% rate hike amid California “insurance crisis” May 13, 2025
    • Optimus scores $22M refinancing for South LA shopping center May 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM