• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Judge refuses to block $320M sale of Angel Stadium

Arte Moreno in front of the redeveloped Angels stadium (City of Anaheim, Getty Images, iStock/Photo Illustration by Steven Dilakian for The Real Deal)

The City of Anaheim has hit a home run in its legal battle over the sale of Angel Stadium, with a judge deciding not to block the $320-million deal.

In a preliminary ruling, Orange County Superior Court Judge David A. Hoffer shot down a lawsuit pressed by residents who accuse city leaders of breaking state meetings laws by negotiating the sale behind closed doors and shutting out the public, the Orange County Register reported.

Hoffer said the way the city handled the sale “substantially complied” with state laws for what can be discussed in closed city council meetings, and that discussions and decisions about the sale “were anything but secret and were fully vetted with the public.”

The Peoples Homeless Task Force Orange County, which filed the suit, and the city have 10 days to object to the decision before it becomes final. .

The Anaheim City Council approved a deal in December 2019 to sell the 150-acre stadium property to SRB Management, a company controlled by Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim owner Arte Moreno, whose pro baseball team plays there. The city voted to trade its stadium for $150 million in cash and $170 million in community benefits, including homes for low-income residents and a 7-acre park as part of a larger mixed-use development around the ballpark.

Anaheim leaders said the deal kept the hometown baseball team while creating a new entertainment district, providing housing and ending expensive stadium maintenance for the city.

SRB plans to develop the stadium parking lots over the next few decades with apartments, hotels, offices, restaurants and shops, while committing the Angels to play in Anaheim through 2050.

“This initial decision is the right decision,” Mayor Harry Sidhu said in an emailed statement. “This validates that the stadium sale was an extensive public process with community input and debate.”

The Peoples Homeless Task Force OC alleged in its lawsuit that city officials decided in secret, months before the public knew, to sell the stadium rather than craft a new lease with Moreno and his Angels Baseball. Its court filings included supporting declarations from former city manager Chris Zapata and Councilman Jose Moreno. It asked the court to scuttle the stadium deal.

Attorney Kelly Aviles, who represents the task force, said it’s considering whether to appeal the judge’s decision.

The stadium deal, which hasn’t closed escrow, awaits another challenge from the state.

The state Department of Housing and Community Development accused Anaheim in December of breaking a state law requiring agencies to offer public land for affordable housing before selling it for another use. It could impose a fine up to $96 million that the city would be required to spend on affordable housing. Anaheim says it’s exempt from the state housing law

[Orange County Register] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Anaheim approves $150M land sale to Angels
  • LA Angels have a plan to build an Anaheim neighborhood from scratch
  • Civil trial over $320M Angel Stadium development deal set

The post Judge refuses to block $320M sale of Angel Stadium appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 22 March 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Audit finds flaws in state’s housing allocation goals →← OC-based buyer for 60,000 sf warehouse in Pomona
  • Recent Posts

    • Feds to sell landmark Spring Street Courthouse in DTLA May 14, 2025
    • Rams owner Stan Kroenke eyes Olympics broadcast center, film studio in Inglewood May 14, 2025
    • Eaton fire victims, others claim insurance adjuster stole repair money  May 14, 2025
    • State Farm approved for 17% rate hike amid California “insurance crisis” May 13, 2025
    • Optimus scores $22M refinancing for South LA shopping center May 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM