• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Colton to extend moratorium on distribution warehouses

Colton Mayor Frank J. Navarro (City of Colton, California)
Colton Mayor Frank J. Navarro (City of Colton, California)

The City of Colton has hit triple-pause on its moratorium against building distribution warehouses.

The Inland Empire city has extended its moratorium for the third time while it studies the adverse impact of such warehouses on the community, the San Bernardino Sun reported. The ban, first enacted in May 2021, is now set to expire May 3, 2023.

The city is concerned about the impacts of a proliferation of new warehouses on its land use and zoning, diesel truck traffic and the health of its 54,000 residents.

Since calling for a warehouse respite a year ago, city staffers and council members have analyzed existing regulations, while researching the harmful impacts that warehouses, distribution centers and truck storage facilities can have on neighborhoods.

And yet, after 12 months of study, “the conditions which necessitated adoption of the Moratorium continue to exist at the present time,” city staffers wrote in their report.

Three warehouse projects with applications accepted before Colton established its initial 45-day moratorium will continue as planned. They include a 960,000-square-foot Barton Road Logistics Center, an 882,000-square-foot Agua Mansa Logistics Center and a much smaller building on South La Cadena Drive.

With cheap, flat available land, a blue-collar workforce and easy access to interstates and rail lines to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the Inland Empire has become America’s warehouse – boosted by soaring demand for e-commerce goods.

Last year, Riverside and San Bernardino counties ranked third in the nation for large warehouse leases.

Between 2004 and 2020, Inland Empire warehouse space doubled to 600 million square feet, the Press-Enterprise reported.

The number of warehouses in San Bernardino County alone – including the city of Colton – increased to 2,998 in 2021, from 203 in 1990, according to an environmental conservancy at Pitzer College in Claremont.

But while the coronavirus pandemic boosted e-commerce growth and demand for instant delivery, such warehouses face growing opposition from residents worried about air pollution, noise and traffic from diesel trucks.

In March, residents in Ontario battling a plan to rezone 220 acres of farmland for industrial use called for a similar moratorium.

Riverside implemented a temporary ban in March 2020, and Jurupa Valley did the same less than a year later. Twice in that time San Bernardino has weighed the pros and cons of establishing a moratorium on new warehouses, and twice the vote has failed.

Earlier this year, the Redlands Planning Commission recommended the City Council hit pause, though the proposal has not yet been brought forward.

Nevertheless, in Colton, certain code amendments, policy initiatives and focused studies have gained traction.

The city is looking at whether to amend zoning to reduce the size of warehouses permitted in the industrial park zone; limit hours of operation within 800 feet of a residential zone; place buildings 1,000 feet from the property lines of a sensitive use; and require the preparation of a health risk assessment for facilities that generate more than 150 truck trips per day.

[San Bernardino Sun] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Inland Empire No. 3 in U.S. for large warehouse leases
  • Critics want moratorium on warehouses in key Inland Empire city
  • Pol says power shortage threatens Inland Empire’s industrial development

The post Colton to extend moratorium on distribution warehouses appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 16 May 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Texas investor seeks premium on sale of Antelope Valley retail →← Red Mountain goes shopping for retail in Inland Empire
  • Recent Posts

    • State Farm approved for 17% rate hike amid California “insurance crisis” May 13, 2025
    • Optimus scores $22M refinancing for South LA shopping center May 13, 2025
    • Landmark, Stockbridge drop $100M for student housing properties near USC May 13, 2025
    • Late philanthropist couple’s Bel-Air manse listed for $35M goes into contract May 13, 2025
    • Apollo’s $1.2B buyout takes Landsea Homes private May 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM