• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Feds pledge $900M for San Fernando Valley light-rail line

LA Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins and a rendering of the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line (LinkedIn/Stephanie Wiggins, Metro)
LA Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins and a rendering of the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line (LinkedIn/Stephanie Wiggins, Metro)

A proposed light rail line through the San Fernando Valley is set to pull out of the station with $900 million in new federal funding.

The Federal Transit Administration said it will provide $909 million over two years to help build the Valley’s first light rail line since the Pacific Red Cars left the tracks in 1952, the Los Angeles Daily News reported.

The FTA earmarked $100 million of those funds for the current fiscal year for the proposed East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line, LA Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins announced.

The 9.2-mile line between Van Nuys Station and the Metrolink Station in Sylmar/San Fernando is expected to cost between $2.8 billion and $3.6 billion. The rail project is scheduled to break ground at the end of the year and start running in June 2028.

The first phase will travel 6.7 miles from the Orange (G) Line busway along the center median of Van Nuys Boulevard to San Fernando Road. A second phase continues northwest another 2.5 miles along the Metrolink rail line.

For its Valley railway, Metro plans to build 14 new stations, nine traction power substations, an overhead contact system, and a maintenance and storage facility on Keswick Street for 34 new vehicles.

The new line will connect to Van Nuys Civic Center, senior and assisted living facilities, Charter High School of the Arts, county family and children’s services, a shopping center at a former General Motors plant, Panorama and Arleta high schools, Pacoima neighborhoods and the City of San Fernando.

When complete, the new rail line is expected to carry 35,000 riders per day with subway links to Union Station, with connections to Koreatown and eventually to an extended Purple (D) Line ending at UCLA.

Besides funding and rising costs, the pending East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line has caused rumblings in the lower-income northeast Valley about gentrification, transit advocates say..

Similar concerns have been expressed in Highland Park in northeast Los Angeles, where the L Line passes through enroute to Pasadena on one end and Downtown L.A. on the other.

Once rail lines are built, properties can rise in value and sometimes, older buildings are torn down and newer, more expensive apartments or condos are built, they say. Rents rise and that can lead to existing residents being forced out.

“There is a concern that developers will come in there and start ripping things out, like older properties, and then they put in something new,” said Bart Reed, a Sylmar resident who serves as executive director of The Transit Coalition, an advocate for bus, rail, pedestrian and bike ways.
The line is supported by Los Angeles, Los Angeles County and state elected officials who say transit options are sorely lacking in the San Fernando Valley.

“The San Fernando Valley, where I grew up, is finally poised to receive the world-class transit it deserves — especially along congested Van Nuys Boulevard,” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti in a statement. “When fully built, this new line will transform how people get around and connect them to new opportunities across Los Angeles County.”

A $2.3 billion makeover and expansion of Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles just picked up $720 million in new Metro funding.

[Los Angeles Daily News] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Metro gives double toot for $2.3B Union Station makeover
  • Metro looks at building Eastside extension to Whittier in two phases
  • Court clears new housing near Expo Line

The post Feds pledge $900M for San Fernando Valley light-rail line appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 02 June 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
L.A. County signed contracts fall for 6th-straight month →← Court settlement clears way for $63M ask on latest Bel Air megamansion to hit market
  • Recent Posts

    • Pasadena Office Tower loses more than half its value in a decade, worth less than debt tied to it July 12, 2025
    • Newsom: Eaton Fire utility lawsuits could stretch already “stressed” California Wildfire Fund July 12, 2025
    • DTLA’s One California Plaza value plummets 74%, lands in foreclosure July 11, 2025
    • Los Angeles city planners give blessing to DTLA mixed-use complex July 11, 2025
    • Residential Movers & Shakers: Brian Sperry shuffles from Coldwell Banker to Compass July 11, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM