• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Manhattan Beach planners reject residents’ attempts to trim 4-story apartment complex

Rendering of the proposed project site at 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland avenues, Manhattan Beach (Withee Malcolm Architects)
Rendering of the proposed project site at 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland avenues, Manhattan Beach (Withee Malcolm Architects)

Four attempts by residents to scale down a 79-unit apartment complex proposed for Manhattan Beach have been rejected by city planners.

The city’s Planning Commission denied the four appeals calling for reconsideration of plans to build a four-story complex on adjacent lots at 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland avenues, the Torrance Daily Breeze reported. Plans can still be appealed at a cost of $500 each.

The 96,200-square-foot building, known as Project Verandas or Highrise El Porto, was approved in March by Community Development Director Carrie Tai. Because it has affordable units, state law allowed staff to OK the project rather than submit it before a public hearing.

The development, to be built on a slope below some Chevron oil tanks, would require razing a
Verandas Beach House event center and a Tradewinds Village retail building.

Highrise El Porto, a developer based in Hermosa Beach led by veteran builder Frank Buckley, has proposed a 37- to 50-foot tall building on the triangular site. It would include 79 one-, two- and three-bedroom units, of which six would be set aside for very-low-income households.

An underground parking garage would serve 127 vehicles, including seven motorcycles and 27 bicycles.

The proposed apartment building was given density bonus for more height, floor area, setbacks and number of stories, plus a concession for a 24-foot maximum wall height. Without the waivers, the building would have been limited to three stories no higher than 30 feet, with a 74,000 square-foot limit.

Residents unhappy with the project filed four appeals — individually and in pairs — asking for it to be scaled down, while calling for an environmental impact study and input from city government.

They argued the “ministerial approval” process undermines local decision making, while the state density bonus law is a loophole that allows for developers to overbuild, saying there would be too much traffic and not enough parking stemming from the residential project.

Some also said its project’s proximity to the Chevron oil refinery would create public health issues, while excavation would pose public safety hazards.

Buckley, in an open letter to residents, said the apartment complex would benefit north Manhattan Beach businesses, increase local parking and produce less traffic than the current shopping and event centers, while helping the city meet state-mandated housing goals.

The upscale South Bay city must build 774 housing units by the end of the decade, of which nearly two thirds must be affordable, according to the state’s proposed housing element for the region.

A nonprofit group tied to the California Association of Realtors has sued Manhattan Beach and five other Southland cities for failing to meet state housing plan deadlines. 

[Torrance Daily Breeze] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Realtors’ rep sues six cities for failing to adopt state housing plans
  • Governor’s signature means Bruce’s Beach transfer can move forward
  • State likely to return Manhattan Beach land to descendants of Black pioneers

The post Manhattan Beach planners reject residents’ attempts to trim 4-story apartment complex appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 14 June 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
LA ban on developer contributions kicks in as final round of mayoral race kicks off →← LVMH gets go ahead for hotel on Rodeo Drive
  • Recent Posts

    • LA ICE raids could chill already tight labor market for homebuilding June 14, 2025
    • AG sues SoCal real estate family, claims landlord exploits tenants June 14, 2025
    • Uncommon Developers secures $150M loan for DTLA office tower June 13, 2025
    • Train track-equipped LA mansion hits market at $20M June 13, 2025
    • Frito-Lay ends manufacturing at famed Rancho Cucamonga plant after 55 years June 13, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM