• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

New bill could force open bidding in future sale of Angel Stadium

Angel Stadium and State Sen.Tom Umberg (Getty)
Angel Stadium and State Sen.Tom Umberg (Getty)

It could soon be open season for affordable housing developers at Angel Stadium.

State Sen.Tom Umberg has responded to the Angel Stadium corruption scandal with a bill that would require any agency to rebid a property it was trying to sell if the state housing department found it had violated the law, the Orange County Register reported.

The upshot: if the City of Anaheim looks again to sell Angel Stadium, the bill would likely force open bidding from affordable housing developers.

Umberg’s bill emerged from the now-aborted sale of Angel Stadium for $320 million to a company led by Angels owner Arte Moreno, and an ongoing federal investigation into city corruption. It would apply only to Orange County, and sunset in 2030.

The state Housing and Community Development Department had handed Anaheim a notice of violation of the Surplus Land Act for failing to negotiate with affordable housing developers before the sale.

Anaheim maintained the law didn’t apply to the stadium deal. The state’s only recourse to break the stalemate would have been to take the city to court.

Umberg, an early critic of the Angel Stadium sale, consulted with Assemblyman Phil Ting, who has written bills to tighten up the Surplus Land Act.

“He and I concluded that it’s best to close whatever ambiguity may exist, so that there’s real teeth so that HCD can effectively enforce any violation,” Umberg told the newspaper.
The state’s surplus land law requires public agencies that want to sell surplus property to first offer it for the potential development of affordable housing.

If they get any viable housing proposals, they must have good-faith discussions with those bidders. If they can’t reach a deal, they can dispose of the land as they see fit.

The city has argued the stadium deal was covered by another provision of state law, which allows officials to skip the bidding process when selling public property for “economic opportunity.”

Anaheim and the state resolved their dispute with a legal settlement requiring the city to put $96 million from the stadium deal into a fund to build affordable housing. The issue then became moot last month when the sale unraveled after former Mayor Harry Sidhu, who helped negotiate it, was revealed to be under federal investigation for corruption.

[Orange County Register] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Feds probe Anaheim mayor over Angel Stadium sale
  • Anaheim scuttles $320-million sale of Angel Stadium
  • Anaheim clears way for stadium sale with $123M for affordable housing

The post New bill could force open bidding in future sale of Angel Stadium appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 16 June 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Pacific Urban picks up Warner Center complex for $415K per unit →← Neighbor hits Safran’s Hollywood Arts Collective with $15M suit
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM