• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Long Beach to size up Queen Mary in wake of failed redevelopment plan

Queen Mary (Google Maps, iStock)
Queen Mary (Google Maps, iStock)

The Port of Long Beach will size up the cost of restoring a rundown Queen Mary after its prior operator gave up plans for a hotel and entertainment makeover and filed for bankruptcy last year.

The Long Beach Board of Harbor Commissioners voted unanimously to approve several contracts to assess repairs and upkeep of the historic ship, the Long Beach Post reported.

The nearly $3 million assessment would come before a potential transfer of the dilapidated ocean liner from the city of Long Beach to the harbor department, which could face hundreds of millions in repair costs.

The city has owned the ship since it arrived in the 1960s, but until recently has leased it to operators responsible for repairs and upkeep. The most recent operator, Urban Commons, filed for bankruptcy last year.

Its parent company, Singapore-based Eagle Hospitality Trust, in October sought to auction its Queen Mary lease.

The city had inked a deal in 2016 to lease the Queen Mary to Urban Commons for 66 years after its executives promised to develop a $250-million entertainment and hotel complex called Queen Mary Island on the waterfront next to the ship.

The complex was never built, and the company was accused in a city audit of mismanagement, financial misrepresentation and for failing to make needed repairs.

Lloyd’s Register Americas Advisory Services (LR) and ABL USA were awarded contracts for $127,795 and $143,110, respectively, for ship assessments. NRC Environmental Services had its on-call hazardous waste contract amended for another $2.4 million.

With a $300,000 project contingency, the total project will cost just under $3 million.

Sam Joumblat, managing director of finance for the port, said the assessment reports will take up to a year. The city will pay another $1 million toward the project, with another $500,000 being considered to be paid out of revenue generated by the ship.

Taking on the Queen Mary could cost the Port of Long Beach more than $350 million in the next five years, according to an estimate.

A marine survey in 2016 found that the Queen Mary would need up to $289 million in repairs to be viable in the next 10 years. But at the start of this year, few of the recommended structural issues have been fixed and their cost would likely be higher because of the ship’s continuing deterioration.

Port officials declined to comment further on the assessment or the potential transfer of the ship into its care “given that it’s a pending matter before the commission,” according to the Post.

The Queen Mary has been closed to the public for more than two years as Long Beach conducts millions in critical repairs.

Officials hope the ship can reopen later this year. The City Council just approved a contract with Evolution Hospitality for day-to-day operations.

[Long Beach Post] – Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Queen Mary getting $250M boost with new entertainment complex
  • Embattled REIT seeks to auction SoCal hotels, Queen Mary lease
  • Urban Commons takes over lease for Queen Mary

The post Long Beach to size up Queen Mary in wake of failed redevelopment plan appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 01 July 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Analysts see likely dip in SoCal home prices →← Koreatown’s new multifamily map
  • Recent Posts

    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM