• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Reform of historic property taxes could impact brokers

Bill Cooper, Matthew Berkley, and clock tower for Eastern Columbia Lofts (Bill Cooper, Matthew Berkley, Andrew Asch of The Real Deal)
Bill Cooper, Matthew Berkley, and clock tower for Eastern Columbia Lofts (Bill Cooper, Matthew Berkley, Andrew Asch of The Real Deal)

Proposed changes to tax breaks for historic homes could impact residential brokers in Los Angeles.

City of Los Angeles’ Planning Department recently released a study that proposes changes to how the Mills Act is implemented in the city. Recommended changes include not automatically renewing Mills Act contracts, which offer property owners cuts in property taxes in exchange for investing the savings from property taxes in the rehabilitation of a historic building. An initial public comment period is scheduled to wrap up Sept. 1.

Cities throughout California run Mills Act contracts programs independently. Los Angeles administers about 948 Mills Act contracts.

Ken Bernstein, a principal city planner for the city of Los Angeles, said that the city’s share of foregone property tax from Mills Act contracts is currently $2.1 million annually. The planning office is considering changes in part because the L.A. City Council placed a $2.1 million limit on foregone revenue from the Mills Act program. Also, after working with the law since 1996, the planning department wanted to see if it could administer Mills Act contracts more efficiently and equitably, Bernstein said.

A change in the way Mills Act is administered in Los Angeles could change the way Bill Cooper of Douglas Elliman does business.

When showing condos in downtown Los Angeles, Cooper tells prospective buyers about tax breaks they can get through California’s Mills Act, which was passed in 1972. In Los Angeles, every Mills Act contract is administered for houses or condos located in a historic cultural monument or in neighborhoods designated as a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, such as University Park in Los Angeles’ West Adams district.

It’s possible for new homeowners to save up to 50 to 70 percent of their property taxes if they close a deal for a unit in a historic building in the downtown area, such as the Eastern Columbia Lofts, a 92-year-old building distinguished by its clock tower and unique turquoise tiles, Cooper said. The property is listed as a Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument.

“It will make it a lot more difficult to sell in historic buildings,” Cooper said. “You’re always competing with new buildings. When it comes down to it, you’re looking at a lot more monthly expenses without the Mills Act.”

Cooper contends that the Mills Act was the deal sweetener that convinced many people to move to downtown Los Angeles during the past decade.

“If you want to see downtown stumble and fall, take away the Mills Act,” he said.

Cooper has focused on downtown condos for the past 20 years. But reform might also affect the way agents sell single-family homes working with Mills Act contracts.

Matthew Berkley of DPP brokerage, headquartered in Pasadena, focuses on single family homes with historic and architectural importance. Berkley said that most of his clients are wealthy enough to be able to afford a home that costs $10 million. A Mills Act contract may not mean as much to Berkley’s preservation-minded clients as a first-time condo buyer.

In his 22 years selling real estate, he does not remember one case of a Mills Act contract being revoked. However, he believes that the market could change if Mills Act contracts are changed. For example, Mills Act guidelines discourage speculators looking to flip an architecturally unique house.

“The houses would be in danger. Properties would be at greater risk of destruction,” Berkley said.

Bernstein with the city of L.A. said his department is evaluating the report’s recommendations and mulling changes it would suggest to the City Council.

“There are some trade-offs,” Bernstein said. “But the city has a strong commitment to grow the program.”

Trade-offs include whether to phase out contracts that have lasted more than a decade. Bernstein stated that those property owners whose contracts are phased out will have a soft landing where they will work with a property tax assessment based on their Mills Act contract for a period of nine years before their taxes return to market rate.

Read more
  • Historic Berkeley show palace could rise as a 15 story apartment building
  • Depression era commercial building in Palo Alto fetches $17M
  • Historic Saks Ffith Avenue complex in Beverly Hills eyed for redevelopment
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Reform of historic property taxes could impact brokers appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 24 August 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Jonathan Azal plans more apartments in Van Nuys →← State bill aims to lower renters’ application fees
  • Recent Posts

    • Mayor Karen Bass blasts everyone but herself for wildfire mishandling May 7, 2025
    • WEA, Beverly Hills Estates cut deal on $27M Malibu Colony home May 7, 2025
    • Oil firm eyes homes, hotel near Bolsa Chica wetlands in Huntington Beach May 7, 2025
    • Bankrupt Rite Aid to market 1.3K stores, including dozens in LA County May 7, 2025
    • Carolwood flexes with new LA pocket listings portal, boasting $1B+ in inventory May 7, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM