• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Realtor-affiliated group sues cities over housing plans

Claremont mayor Jed Leano and CAR's Otto Catrina (CAR, Getty, City of Claremont)
Claremont mayor Jed Leano and CAR’s Otto Catrina (CAR, Getty, City of Claremont)

A group sponsored by the California Association of Realtors (CAR) has sued three Southern California cities for failing to comply with the state’s housing requirements — a move that’s likely to only add to the already thick tension between numerous California cities and the state over housing policy.

The new lawsuits, filed earlier this month in county court, take aim at Claremont, in eastern L.A. County; La Mirada, in southeast L.A. County; and Fullerton, in northern Orange County.

Those three cities “were selected because, in our assessment, they are unlikely to adopt valid housing elements within the next six to 12 months without being forced to do so through litigation,” Matthew Gelfand, an attorney for the plaintiff, Californians for Homeownership, said in a statement.

Otto Catrina, the president of CAR, added that the lawsuits “send a message to cities” that they have an obligation “to plan for the housing growth needed to support California’s growing population.”

In Southern California, cities’ updated housing element plans were due last October, and numerous cities have yet to finalize their plans.

Claremont responded to the suit by asserting that it is, in fact, “committed to complying” with the law and is currently working on the update. In a statement, Brad Johnson, the city’s community development director, also blamed the delay on a consultant logjam.

“Like most cities in the San Gabriel Valley, the City of Claremont is using special housing consultants to assist in the implementation of its Housing Element update,” he said. “For a variety of reasons, these consultants are experiencing very high demand.”

Claremont’s statement also pointed to a state agency statistic on the problem: Out of 539 California jurisdictions, 201 — or 37 percent — were out of compliance with state housing element law as of mid-September.

The statement did not specify whether Claremont planned to contest the suit.

Representatives for La Mirada and Fullerton did not respond to requests for comment.

Contrary to Catrina’s assertion, California’s population is not actually “growing” — in fact it has decreased for two straight years, and is likely to remain mostly flat for decades — but the Golden State is nevertheless mired in a housing crisis that was caused in large part by anti-density zoning laws that dictated local and state policy for decades.

In recent years the state has very publicly reversed course, including with a package of pro-density bills signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom earlier this week, but the statewide legislation so far has barely made a dent. One recent estimate pegged the state’s housing inventory shortage at nearly 1 million units, easily the highest in the country, while new development under SB 9, a major zoning law reform that went into effect in January, appears to be minimal.

Cities around the state, meanwhile, have aggressively challenged SB 9, often by passing their own creative, highly onerous development requirements that effectively undercut the state law. The local measures have in turn led to conflict with the attorney general’s office, and prompted bigger questions about the new law’s long term viability.

“These are going to be ongoing battles,” Eric Sussman, a real estate professor at UCLA, said earlier this year. “This is front and center of what matters to people in the state.”

The new lawsuits from Californians for Homeownership come six months after the group filed an initial round of legal complaints against six SoCal cities that were out of compliance. Three of those cities – Bradbury, Laguna Hills and South Pasadena – have recently settled, according to the industry nonprofit, with agreements to accept noncompliance penalties, reimburse legal fees and make timely changes to their plans. South Pasadena, for example, had been counting land parcels with little chance of ever being developed toward its housing quota, but agreed to remove those parcels.

Earlier this year, Californians for Homeownership also sued La Habra Heights, Manhattan Beach and Vernon.

Read more
  • Pasadena withstands AG’s slings and arrows on SB 9
  • Attorney general warns Pasadena on SB 9
  • Newsom signs flurry of housing bills
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Realtor-affiliated group sues cities over housing plans appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 30 September 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Developer applies Q brand to Playa Vista apartments →← New LA plan seeks to protect affordable housing near USC
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM