• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Most SoCal cities miss state housing plan deadline

Residential real estate, Southern California, housing element, rezoning, penalties
(Photo Illustration by The Real Deal with Getty)

Nearly two thirds of Southern California cities and counties have breezed past a state deadline to plan more homes, giving up a 2.5-year extension to rezone land.

Some 124 governments failed to get their final “housing element” plan approved by Oct. 15, forcing them to become compliant or face major penalties, the Orange County Register reported.

The consequences of remaining out of compliance can be severe for the 124 jurisdictions, which have been ordered to plan for a combined 474,210 new homes. Missing the final deadline means they no longer have until February 2025 to rezone communities.

Unless they get state approval for a new blueprint on how to meet housing goals by 2030, and rezone enough land to build them, they risk fines, lawsuits and the loss of billions of dollars in housing and transportation grants.

The delinquent jurisdictions also risk losing control over local development.

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment, as it’s known, requires cities and counties to revise their housing elements every eight years to account for population growth and ensure that housing supply meets demand, with adequate housing for low- and moderate-income residents.

The housing plans outline where and how new housing can be built and on what sites developers can build new homes. Once the housing element is adopted, governments must rezone enough land for the new affordable and market-rate housing.

Currently, 121 cities and the counties of Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino “are doubly non-compliant,” according to the state Housing and Community Development Department.

“There are real consequences right now for jurisdictions that remain out of compliance, including ineligibility for a handful of funding programs at the state,” David Zisser, a deputy director for accountability at the housing department, told the Register. That’s why there’s plenty of reason for jurisdictions to continue to work to get their housing elements into compliance.”

The upside is that 73 jurisdictions that won state approval for their plans represent 65 percent of the 1.3 million new housing units the state wants to build in Southern California by the end of the decade.

They include some of the region’s biggest cities, from Los Angeles, Long Beach, Santa Ana, Riverside, Fontana, Ontario, Moreno Valley, Irvine and Torrance. They also include Los Angeles, Ventura and Imperial counties.

The cities of Redondo Beach and Santa Monica recently felt the effects of missing a key February housing element deadline, even though they both met Saturday’s deadline to get their housing plans approved.
Developers in Santa Monica are seeking approval for thousands of homes under the so-called “builder’s remedy,” a rule giving developers more leeway under the state’s Housing Accountability Act.

The legal loophole forces cities without an approved housing element to approve projects that violate planning and zoning rules, like height limits, so long as they include a certain percentage of low- or moderate-income housing.

The untested builder’s remedy could impact Redondo Beach and Santa Monica because developers applied for approval while those cities still were out of compliance with the housing element rules.

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Santa Monica’s failed housing plan sparks building boom
  • State quickly closes ‘builder’s remedy’ loophole with OK of Santa Monica’s housing plan
  • Torrance housing plan squeaks under state deadline

The post Most SoCal cities miss state housing plan deadline appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 20 October 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Gondola moves closer to floating fans to Dodger Stadium →← LA County leads the nation in overcrowded homes
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM