• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Caruso vs. Hackman: Questions over candidate’s stance on Television City development

Los Angeles mayoral candidate Rick Caruso and Hackman Capital Partners’ Zach Sokoloff (Getty, Capital Partners)
Los Angeles mayoral candidate Rick Caruso and Hackman Capital Partners’ Zach Sokoloff (Getty, Capital Partners)

At a Hollywood Chamber of Commerce event earlier this month, developer and mayoral candidate Rick Caruso was holding a coffee onstage when someone asked about mailers sent to residents urging them to oppose Hackman Capital Partners’ proposed Television City project in Fairfax.

Caruso nodded, as if to understand the flyers the individual was referencing, and took a sip of coffee.

“How do we reconcile these two Carusos that are either pro-studio development or possible anti-studio development?” the man in the audience asked.

“I am completely in support of the redevelopment of Television City,” Caruso answered. “Always have been.”

“What we have said to those developers,” Caruso added, using “we” to refer to his firm Caruso, “is that their traffic plan doesn’t work.”

While Caruso has publicly supported L.A.’s entertainment industry and the development of new studios, his firm has privately opposed the redevelopment of Television City, currently home to CBS on Beverly Boulevard, according to Zach Sokoloff at Hackman, who is spearheading the development and told TRD of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce event.

“I’m aware of the misalignment of businessperson Caruso’s private actions and public Caruso’s public statements,” Sokoloff said.

Neither Caruso, the company, nor the campaign responded to requests for comment.

Caruso’s company is financially supporting the Beverly Fairfax Community Alliance, an entity formed to “publicly raise and address significant concerns” with the Television City project, the alliance confirmed earlier this year to TRD.

Hackman plans to build a 1.8-million-square-foot development at Television City, consisting of soundtages, offices and ground-floor retail.

Caruso’s nextdoor shopping mall The Grove, through law firm Latham & Watkins, has submitted a 374-page comment on Hackman’s draft environmental review for the Television City project, arguing the review is “fatally flawed” and the project would have “significant impacts” on the community, according to a copy obtained by TRD.

At the chamber event, Caruso detailed how his only opposition to the project was traffic concerns.

But, The Grove has a laundry list of concerns in its comment on the draft environmental review, including a “deficient” air quality analysis; a “fundamentally incomplete and inadequate” section on impacts to cultural resources; failing to properly analyze natural gas usage; failing to detail a comprehensive floor plan; and increased traffic congestion.

“It’s designed to gum us up in CEQA and delay the project,” Sokoloff said, referring to the California Environmental Quality Act. Developers often argue CEQA is utilized to delay projects, given citizens can sue planned real estate projects by challenging CEQA-mandated analyses.

No litigation over the project has been filed, according to Sokoloff, though he expects Caruso to “try and litigate the project,” which would delay construction and the opening of the soundstages.

Caruso, at the chamber event, said his firm asked Hackman to “redistribute the traffic” at the project, but the company “refused to do that.”

Sokoloff said Hackman spent almost three months negotiating with Caruso, but the latter “persisted in making unreasonable demands that would have rendered the studio infeasible.”

Hackman decided to proceed with publishing a draft environmental review — a key step in the CEQA process — after which Caruso, the firm, “unilaterally ended all negotiations.”

The project’s impact to traffic “would be less than significant,” a spokesperson for the L.A. City Planning Department said.

Caruso, who is facing a close mayoral election against Congresswoman Karen Bass on Nov. 8, has worked in recent months to distance himself from his firm, known for developing The Grove and Americana at Brand in Glendale, among other retail centers.

Hackman’s Chief Accountability Officer Heather Somaini contributed $1,500 to Karen Bass’ campaign in July, according to donation filings. No individual who has included Hackman Capital Partners as their employer has donated to Rick Caruso’s campaign.

At the event, Caruso said the new CEO of his firm, Corrine Verdery, has spent time with the executives to discuss the plan, adding he has stepped away from the company. Caruso has proposed to put his holdings into a blind trust if he’s elected as mayor.

“For someone who claims he was distancing himself between him and his company, he knows a lot about the project,” Sokoloff said.

Hackman will have to address all of the comments on the project, including The Grove’s, to produce a final environmental review.

“I have never opposed a project in my life,” Caruso said at the panel. “And I don’t oppose this one.”

Read more
  • Meet Rick Caruso’s successor-in-waiting: Corinne Verdery
  • Rick Caruso: Yes, a trustee could sell The Grove
  • Rick Caruso in spat over CBS Television City expansion
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Caruso vs. Hackman: Questions over candidate’s stance on Television City development appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 25 October 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Home listing scam sends Torrance man to prison for nine years →← The Derby restaurant in Arcadia to expand with 214 apartments
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM