• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Builder’s remedy could allow thousands of new homes in California

Santa Monica Councilmember Phil Brock (Linkedin, Getty)
Santa Monica Councilmember Phil Brock (Linkedin, Getty)

Home developers stymied by regulations in California are roaring through a legal loophole known as the builder’s remedy – with cities and slow-growth groups preparing to push back.

Developers employed the little-known legal tactic this fall for thousands of apartments planned in Santa Monica and Redondo Beach after the cities failed to produce housing plans required by the state, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Now the builder’s remedy has become an option for developers in cities and counties statewide, including 124 in Southern California, that failed to meet a state deadline to plan for more homes. Cities in the Bay Area face a similar deadline on Jan. 31.

The pending construction boom stems from a provision in the decades-old Housing Accountability Act to spur construction by imposing a penalty if cities fail to pass “housing element” plans that comply with state housing goals.

Under the law, cities deemed noncompliant lose the authority to approve or deny projects with affordable housing components – which are automatically approved.

Developers can essentially propose building whatever they want, as long as they provide a percentage of affordable homes for low- or middle-income families.

In Santa Monica, WSC Communities, a development firm founded by Neil Shekhter and Scott Walter, used the builder’s remedy to greenlight 4,500 apartments – more than the city has built in a decade. Of 16 developments, including two from other builders, more than 900 units would be affordable.

In Redondo Beach, Next Century Power, a development firm founded by Leo Pustilnikov, used the legally untested tactic to pave the way for nearly 2,300 homes atop a former beachside power plant. Of those, more than 450 units would be affordable.

The builder’s remedy plans have stunned local elected officials, with some worrying that beachfront communities will lose their distinctiveness.

Santa Monica Councilmember Phil Brock called a 15-story highrise proposed by WSC as “beyond the pale” and an “unacceptable bar for the rest of the city.” He expects he and the City Council will try to block at least some of the projects.

“Some of this growth will be destructive to the idea that Santa Monica somewhere along the line was supposed to be a beachside town,” Brock told the Times. “As we blend into L.A., we’ll lose that character.”

One sticking point for the builder’s remedy projects could be the California Environmental Quality Act, which could require a lengthy review of environmental effects and open the door to litigation.

A slow-growth group, Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City, is urging the City Council to consider filing a lawsuit to stop the projects.

“To say residents and council members are deeply concerned about this developer ambush and have questions that must be answered is an understatement,” the group said in a statement.

Because the builder’s remedy is untested in court, legal questions remain over what developments qualify, said Chris Elmendorf, a law professor at UC Davis who has researched the builder’s remedy loophole.

Because developers must dedicate at least 20 percent of units for low-income families or 100 percent for middle-income ones, the projects could be infeasible in less expensive areas with lower profit margins, he said.

Because of these uncertainties, Elmendorf doesn’t expect the builder’s remedy to lead to a massive surge in housing construction across the state. “The only places where this is a real threat is where development is super expensive,” he said.

In the Bay Area, the builder’s remedy workaround for developers could be duplicated in San Francisco, Berkeley, Oakland and San Jose, which each risk missing the Jan. 31 housing element deadline.

Santa Monica could be a bellwether for the Bay Area, Elmendorf told the San Francisco Business Times. “One scenario that seems quite plausible is that there will be a ton of these projects filed” if Bay Area cities fail to meet the deadline, he said.

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Most SoCal cities miss state housing plan deadline
  • Santa Monica’s failed housing plan sparks building boom
  • Redevelopment planned for 49-acre power plant in Redondo Beach

The post Builder’s remedy could allow thousands of new homes in California appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 27 October 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Ventus Group revamps plans for housing near USC →← Pustilnikov strikes again with ‘builder’s remedy’ in Beverly Hills
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM