• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Facing YIMBY suit, Burbank approves Pickwick Bowl project

City of Burbank mayor Jess Talamantes and Pickwick Bowl (City of Burbank, Pickwick Bowl, Getty)
City of Burbank mayor Jess Talamantes and Pickwick Bowl (City of Burbank, Pickwick Bowl, Getty)

For months, an Orange County developer has been locked in a battle with neighborhood opponents and the Burbank City Council over a proposal to transform the Pickwick Bowl, a decades-old bowling alley, into a major townhome development.

On Tuesday, after facing a YIMBY lawsuit that’s based on the same state law that’s helping to bolster an ongoing wave of builder’s remedy projects, the City of Burbank capitulated, approving the project with minor modifications.

“It’s good news,” said Sonja Trauss, executive director of YIMBY Law, the state housing group that filed the suit, “in that it’s good news for housing and the expectation of cities that the state law is real and there’s not any point in trying to fight it.”

A representative for Burbank’s planning department did not respond to a request for comment.

The now-approved Pickwick Project is slated to rise on the property that’s currently home of the Pickwick Bowl, a large bowling alley that was built in the 1950s and has plenty of local devotees. The developer is MW Investment Group, a firm based in Laguna Beach that previously built multifamily and commercial projects including Domain, a West Hollywood apartment complex that opened in 2017.

Matthew Waken, the firm’s principal, did not respond to a request for comment.

The 5-acre project will add to a slate of high-profile residential projects that have been cropping up in Burbank in recent years. In place of the bowling alley and a parking lot, Waken plans 92 three-story townhomes, ranging from roughly 1,200 to 1,900 square feet, with garages.

The development also includes an equestrian trail. The plan the city agreed to on Tuesday was largely unchanged from Waken’s earlier plans, although the number of units in the development was reduced from 96 to 92.

An entity connected to Waken bought two land parcels for the project for $21 million from Pickwick Recreation Center in July 2021. The same month his firm filed plans for the project in line with SB 35, a 2017 statute that aimed to increase the state’s housing supply by removing cities’ authority to approve housing projects if the state has deemed them out of compliance on their local housing plans.

To qualify under SB 35, 10 percent of units must be reserved for affordable housing. The law, which had received scant attention until this year, also serves as a kind of legal complement to another, older California “builder’s remedy” provision, which allows developers to bypass zoning requirements in cities that are out of compliance. To apply for the zoning bypass, the projects must have a 20 percent minimum affordable requirement; the previously obscure measure was abruptly cast into the national spotlight earlier this month after it emerged that Santa Monica, also out of compliance, was effectively forced to accept more than a dozen high-density projects that could remake the coastal city.

The same builder’s remedy tactic has been applied in Beverly Hills and Redondo Beach.

“SB 35 takes away our discretion,” Patrick Prescott, Burbank’s development director, acknowledged last year after Waken’s firm filed the Pickwick plans, a local news site reported. “This project will go through what the state intends it to be, which is to remove our discretion and require us to approve it if it complies with the state statute.”

The project plans prompted a public outcry, however, as dozens of residents, many of whom saw the Pickwick Bowl, a venue that sits next to a garden and ice arena, as a nostalgic community landmark. In April, even as Burbank had failed to meet its Housing Element requirements, the City Council voted unanimously to reject the application, arguing it didn’t meet SB 35 requirements because of zoning issues.

One councilmember blasted the residential plan as “jamming a square peg into a round hole” and warned it would “potentially [shatter] the Rancho neighborhood.”

Yet, even as the council voted against it, city officials said the opposition could prompt a lawsuit. YIMBY Law, which has also won a similar SB 35 battle in Santa Cruz, filed its complaint within weeks.

Read more
  • Pustilnikov strikes again with ‘builder’s remedy’ in Beverly Hills
  • “Builder’s remedy” could ignite housing boom in San Francisco
  • State quickly closes ‘builder’s remedy’ loophole with OK of Santa Monica’s housing plan
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Facing YIMBY suit, Burbank approves Pickwick Bowl project appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 28 October 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Hasbro seeks to sublease office with 80K sf in Burbank →← Mother of murder victim sues Ahaheim landlord
  • Recent Posts

    • Mayor Karen Bass blasts everyone but herself for wildfire mishandling May 7, 2025
    • WEA, Beverly Hills Estates cut deal on $27M Malibu Colony home May 7, 2025
    • Oil firm eyes homes, hotel near Bolsa Chica wetlands in Huntington Beach May 7, 2025
    • Bankrupt Rite Aid to market 1.3K stores, including dozens in LA County May 7, 2025
    • Carolwood flexes with new LA pocket listings portal, boasting $1B+ in inventory May 7, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM