• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Reuben brothers respond to DigitalBridge’s Century Plaza allegations

Digital Bridge’s Marc Ganzi, Simon and David Reuben with Fairmont Century Plaza (Digital Bridge, Getty, Google Maps)
Digital Bridge’s Marc Ganzi, Simon and David Reuben with Fairmont Century Plaza (Digital Bridge, Getty, Google Maps)

The Reuben brothers have responded to the slew of allegations DigitalBridge has made against them, which claim the billionaire brothers deliberately failed to act after Michael Rosenfeld defaulted on more than $1.8 billion in loans connected to his Century Plaza project in Century City.

Their response: denial.

The brothers and their investment vehicle Motcomb Estates insisted that they didn’t act in bad faith when administering both senior and mezzanine loans on the development, according to a 43-page response filed with New York Supreme Court last week. The investors did not file any cross complaints.

DigitalBridge’s claims “are or will shortly become moot,” the Reubens said in the filing, as it has already pursued a foreclosure against Century Plaza, with an auction scheduled for Dec. 14.

But DigitalBridge, another mezzanine lender on the property, has argued it’s too little too late.

In March, the firm — formerly known as Colony Capital — sued the Reuben brothers, claiming they did nothing for several months after Michael Rosenfeld defaulted. By doing nothing, the brothers’ investment vehicle “violated its responsibilities” in servicing the mezzanine portion of the loan.

Though the Reubens are exuding some confidence that the foreclosure will resolve all claims, an attorney for the brothers, Matthew Parrott, conceded at a Sept. 30 hearing that “nobody can know” how the auction will play out.

“We won’t know if there are any losses actually suffered until, at a minimum, after the auction occurs,” Parrott said.

Until the UCC foreclosure auction happens, the case will still move forward, Judge Barry Ostrager said at the same hearing, where he denied the Reubens’ request to dismiss the claims.

“In the best of all worlds there will be a UCC foreclosure action which will moot the entire case,” the judge said.

The Reubens were hit with a second lawsuit over their actions involving Century Plaza last month. A group of EB-5 lenders sued the brothers for reshuffling the debt stack over four years.

From 2016 to 2020, the Reubens went from holding a small stake in the senior loan for the property to holding more than $1.2 billion worth of debt on the project and becoming the sole administrator of both the senior and mezzanine portions of the loan.

By doing so, the Reubens have “destroyed … any real prospect of repayment” to the EB-5 lenders.

Read more
  • Inside Michael Rosenfeld’s $1.8B odyssey at Century Plaza
  • First we take Manhattan: Inside Reuben Brothers’ NYC shopping spree
  • Relevant’s Hollywood hotels head to foreclosure auction
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Reuben brothers respond to DigitalBridge’s Century Plaza allegations appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 08 November 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Oracle puts Santa Monica office complex up for sale →← Santa Monica council member: Let’s work together on builder’s remedy
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM