• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

WSC lists three builder’s remedy-approved projects in Santa Monica

From left: Neil Shekhter and WSC Communities' Scott Walter with 2901 Santa Monica Boulevard
From left: Neil Shekhter and WSC Communities’ Scott Walter with 2901 Santa Monica Boulevard (Google Maps)

Just months after rushing to capitalize on a legal loophole known as builder’s remedy in the city of Santa Monica, WSC Communities is looking to sell three of the development parcels it scored automatic approvals for, The Real Deal has learned.

The firm, run by Scott Walter and Neil Shekhter, listed three sites at 1238 7th Street, 2901 Santa Monica Boulevard and 1441 Lincoln Avenue, according to marketing materials obtained by TRD. Westmac holds the 7th Street listing, while Walker & Dunlop is marketing the other two sites.

WSC were among the first firms in the state to test the builder’s remedy provision — the penalty imposed on cities for failing to produce a state-approved housing plan.

In October, the firm filed builder’s remedy applications for 14 projects in Santa Monica, scoring a rubber-stamped green light to redevelop the sites into more than 5,000 new apartments. One of the proposals was for a 15-story tower at 5050 Nebraska Avenue.

Under state law, California cities must submit housing plans that comply with state housing goals. Cities that fail to meet deadlines to get these plans approved by the state are deemed noncompliant and lose the ability to approve or deny projects with affordable housing components.

Following its filings for the projects, WSC’s investment partner wanted to list those three properties, according to Walter, who declined to name his firm’s partner.

Combined, the sites are entitled for 725 units, according to the marketing materials. The Santa Monica Boulevard project is set to be the largest, given its entitlements for a 12-story, 200-unit building.

“A window of opportunity opened for developers to submit applications for developments beyond the scope of the existing housing element,” marketing materials for 2910 Santa Monica read.

Guiding prices have not been disclosed, but last year, under different market conditions, WSC sold eight sites in Santa Monica entitled for about 600 units to Tishman Speyer for $150 million, or about $250,000 per unit.

WSC is planning to move forward with developing the 11 other sites that scored entitlements through builder’s remedy. Together they total more than 4,000 units.

Still, the entitlements may not be set in stone. The city of Santa Monica is exploring ways to work with WSC Communities and other developers to “work out something,”  councilmember Phil Brock told TRD earlier this month. The city council previously explored hiring outside legal counsel to weigh its options with the builder’s remedy projects, but has since reconsidered.

“We’re not preparing for a fight,” Brock concluded.

Read more
  • Builder’s remedy mania will soon migrate to Bay Area
  • OC cities hustle to avoid builder’s remedy “travesty”
  • “Builder’s remedy” could ignite housing boom in San Francisco
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post WSC lists three builder’s remedy-approved projects in Santa Monica appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 16 November 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
LA transfer tax advocates declare victory →← Ratkovich JV scores $90M in energy and construction financing for West Harbor
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM