• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Developer sues Manhattan Beach for rejecting project

Highrose El Porto's Frank Buckley with rendering of 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland Avenues (LinkedIn, Withee Malcolm Architects, Getty)
Highrose El Porto’s Frank Buckley with rendering of 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland Avenues (LinkedIn, Withee Malcolm Architects, Getty)

A Sacramento developer has sued the city of Manhattan Beach, which ran afoul of state housing regulators after rejecting a 79-unit apartment complex.

Highrose El Porto, run by developer Frank Buckley, filed the lawsuit asking the court to reverse the City Council’s denial of the four-story project at 401 Rosecrans and 3770 Highland avenues, the Torrance Daily Breeze reported.

The developer seeks damages equal to its loss of investment.

“This case highlights the continuing struggle between the legislatively declared critical statewide need for affordable housing,” the lawsuit states, and “mobilized anti-development (folks) who lobby and cajole their elected officials into stopping further development in their communities at any cost.”

Mayor Steve Napolitano declined to comment on the litigation. The council is expected to discuss it in a closed session this week.

Buckley’s proposal called for a 40- to 50-foot high building on a triangle-shaped lot with 79 studio, one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments, of which six would be set aside as affordable, according to Urbanize Los Angeles. An underground garage would serve 127 cars.

The project, dubbed Highrose El Porto, would replace the Verandas Beach House event center and Tradewinds Village retail building. The two merged lots would allow for the Highrose project south of a Chevron oil refinery located in El Segundo.

The extended gray, turquoise and white building, designed by Torrance-based Withee Malcolm Architects, would include a pool, yard and terrace patio decks.

The developer received administrative approval — allowed under state law because of the six affordable units included in the 96,200-square-foot complex. Residents of the upscale South Bay city then appealed to the Planning Commission, which approved the project.

Residents then appealed to the City Council, which finally rejected the project in October, saying they weren’t willing to approve an unconventional building near the oil refinery that could impact the health and safety of residents – despite other housing in that area, according to the Breeze.

“Allowing people to dwell adjacent to known sources of air pollution must be mitigated by extended buffer zones,” Napolitano, the mayor, said. “The risks cannot be mitigated. Something will go there sometime, but it shouldn’t be housing.”

The developer, in a lawsuit filed last month, said the city flouted state requirements to approve projects with affordable housing, as well as the city’s municipal code and development plans.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development also sent Manhattan Beach a letter last month saying the denial violated the Housing Accountability Act and the State Density Bonus Law.

To have lawfully denied one or more of the development standard waivers allowed under those laws, the letter said, the city had to determine specific adverse impacts the project would cause. The city didn’t do that, according to the state housing office.

The city has until Dec. 28, to respond to the state with a specific plan and timeline for corrective action, the letter said, including repealing the denial and reconsidering the project. If the city doesn’t respond, the housing department could refer the matter to the state Attorney General’s office.

“This case is not just about a city failing to comply with its own commitments to the state and the public to allow affordable housing in its jurisdiction,” Michael Shonafelt, attorney for Highrose, said in a statement. “It’s also about the rule of law and whether the citizens can rely on a city to follow its own laws and general plan.”

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Manhattan Beach planners reject residents’ attempts to trim 4-story apartment complex
  • Realtors’ rep sues six cities for failing to adopt state housing plans
  • Manhattan Beach home away from water lists for $22M

The post Developer sues Manhattan Beach for rejecting project appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 20 December 2022
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Harbor home in Newport Beach sells for $23M →← Top industrial deals prove sector’s resilience in 2022
  • Recent Posts

    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM