• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Beverly Hills voters may decide fate of Cheval Blanc hotel

Beverly Hills Mayor Lili Bosse and LVMH's Bernard Arnault with renderings of Cheval Blanc (City of Beverly Hills, Getty, Gruen Associates)
Beverly Hills Mayor Lili Bosse and LVMH’s Bernard Arnault with renderings of Cheval Blanc (City of Beverly Hills, Getty, Gruen Associates)

LVMH is a hotel brand often reserved for those who can afford a $2,000 handbag or $300 bottles of cognac. Now, the future of its developement on Rodeo Drive is set to be decided by voters.

Labor union Unite Here Local 11 has garnered enough signatures to put two referenda on the ballot in Beverly Hills that would ask voters to overturn the City Council’s approval of the 109-key Cheval Blanc hotel and the development agreement for the project.

In September, the City Council approved the project and passed a development deal two months later. The hotel, set to rise at 468 Rodeo Drive, is expected to be a revenue windfall for the city, generating at least $725 million.

L.A. County is currently reviewing the signatures, a process that is set to be completed by Feb. 2, after which the council will meet, according to a spokesperson for the city of Beverly Hills. Under California law, the union had to obtain signatures from 10 percent of all registered city voters — about 2,100 people.

If all the signatures are certified, the referenda will trigger an election, delaying the project further. Also, the City Council can rescind both the development agreement and the approval.

At the Nov. 1 meeting where the council approved the project, a representative for Unite Here Local 11 voiced opposition to the project, saying more needed to be set aside for affordable housing for workers.

Last month, Beverly Hills Mayor Lili Bosse called signing the petitions “a devastating mistake” and continued to advocate for the project, according to a column published in the Beverly Hills Courier.

“This petition is not resident driven, it is union driven,” she wrote, adding petitioners could remove their signatures if they were having second thoughts.

The only council member to oppose the project was John Mirisch, who argued the city should have charged LVMH more for the project.

“Don’t be concerned about LVMH’s finances,” he said at the November meeting. “They’re doing quite well.”

LVMH is familiar with hurdles on the project. During the planning process, luxury retailers including Hermès, Giorgio Armani and Chanel had concerns that construction of the hotel would disrupt their own operations and block a shared alley for VIP clients.

Read more
  • LVMH books Rodeo Drive hotel for $200M: sources
  • Pustilnikov strikes again with ‘builder’s remedy’ in Beverly Hills
  • Beverly Hills City Council approves Rodeo Drive hotel
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

The post Beverly Hills voters may decide fate of Cheval Blanc hotel appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 04 January 2023
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Here are the largest LA office leases of 2022 →← SoCal home prices fall for sixth straight month
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM