• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Family to sell Bruce’s Beach back to LA County for $20M

Charles and Willa Bruce with Bruce’s Beach (California African American Museum, Getty)
Charles and Willa Bruce with Bruce’s Beach (California African American Museum, Getty)

Six months after Los Angeles County returned Bruce’s Beach to the descendants of Black owners, the family is selling the property in Manhattan Beach back to the county for $20 million.

The Bruce family, whose beachfront property was returned in July after it was seized nearly a century ago because they were Black, will sell two parcels back to the county, the Torrance Daily Breeze reported. https://www.dailybreeze.com/2023/01/03/bruce-family-to-sell-recently-returned-land-to-l-a-county-for-20-million/

George Fatheree III, the Bruce family’s attorney, who negotiated the reparations, announced the family’s decision to sell the land during a KBLA radio interview. County Supervisor Janice Hahn confirmed the upcoming sale, which must occur by the end of the month.

“My clients were essentially robbed of their birthright: they should’ve grown up as part of a hospitality dynasty like the Hiltons,” Fatheree said in the radio interview. “The ability to sell the property and invest the funds presents an opportunity for my clients to get a glimpse of that legacy that was theirs.”

The return of the land last summer marked the nation’s first apparent act of property-based reparation.

The land once housed Bruce’s Beach Lodge, a seaside resort owned by and operated for Black people as a recreational haven in the early 20th century, when African Americans were barred from many public beaches. The Bruce family was harassed by the white community and the Ku Klux Klan.

The city of Manhattan Beach used eminent domain to take the land owned by Willa and Charles Bruce, along with nearly two dozen properties, for a park that wasn’t built for decades.

The 1924 seizure, historical records show, was initiated to force Black people out of Manhattan Beach. In 1948, about 20 years after Manhattan Beach took over the land, the city gave the property to the state. The state gave the parcels to L.A. County in 1995, on the condition the county couldn’t transfer the property. A state law cleared the way for the land return.

The Bruce family formally received the deed to the two parcels on July 20, more than 90 years after Manhattan Beach seized the land bordered by 26th and 27th streets, and Manhattan Avenue and The Strand. The Bruces’ great-grandsons, Marcus and Derrick Bruce, own the 7,000 square-foot property, valued at $20 million.

When the Bruces received the deed, they agreed to lease the property back to the county for $413,000 a year for two years. After that, they had the option of selling the property back to the county.

The family has already told the county it wants to sell the property, according to Hahn, who spearheaded the legislative effort to return the land.

“The seizure of Bruce’s Beach nearly a century ago was an injustice inflicted upon not just Willa and Charles Bruce,” Hahn said in a statement, “but generations of their descendants who almost certainly would have been millionaires.”

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • LA County returns Bruce’s Beach to descendants of Black owners
  • State likely to return Manhattan Beach land to descendants of Black pioneers
  • Governor’s signature means Bruce’s Beach transfer can move forward

The post Family to sell Bruce’s Beach back to LA County for $20M appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 04 January 2023
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Markwood to build 84 workforce apartments in South LA →← Healthcare Property Advisors buys headquarters for $80M
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM