• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

IE warehouse boom generates call for building moratorium

Susan Phillips, a professor of environmental analysis and director of Pitzer College’s Robert Redford Conservancy for Southern California Sustainability and San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman with warehouses in San Bernardino county
Susan Phillips, a professor of environmental analysis and director of Pitzer College’s Robert Redford Conservancy for Southern California Sustainability and San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman with warehouses in San Bernardino county (Getty, San Bernardino county, Pitzer)

Dozens of environmental, labor and community groups now seek a state moratorium on distribution warehouses in the Inland Empire.

In response to a boom in logistics warehouses across Riverside and San Bernardino counties, more than 60 groups signed a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom calling for a one- to two-year pause on warehouse construction, the Riverside Press-Enterprise reported.

The Jan. 24 letter calls the massive expansion of the Inland Empire logistics industry “one of the most critical environmental justice issues of our time.”

It calls for a public health emergency declaration and a one- or two-year moratorium to better protect residents from problems linked to warehouses and warehouse-bound diesel trucks.

“We have a right to a life not impacted by asthma, heart disease, cognitive and reproductive problems related to pollution exposure,” the letter states. “We have a right to not be made sick by the air we breathe.”

A range of progressive groups and organizations focused on environmental justice and immigrants rights signed the letter, which also went to state Attorney General Rob Bonta and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond.

No Inland Empire cities or local public agencies signed the 22-page document.

The letter is a result of widespread frustration over local governments’ unwillingness to curb logistics growth or address its problems, Susan Phillips, a professor of environmental analysis and director of Pitzer College’s Robert Redford Conservancy for Southern California Sustainability, told the Press-Enterprise.

“We have felt there is no other pathway forward other than to ask the state leaders to intervene,” Phillips said. “We’ve tried everything. Our environmental justice partners have tried everything. The system is totally biased toward development and community input is virtually meaningless. It’s a box you check and that’s what needs to change.”

San Bernardino County Supervisor Curt Hagman defended the logistics industry and how local governments handle warehouse projects in an op-ed piece published by the Southern California News Group.

Inland air quality is improving because the logistics industry “continues to invest in environmentally friendly buildings and the trucking industry commits to vehicles with reduced or near zero-emission emissions,” Hagman wrote, adding that local governments must follow “California’s stringent environmental laws.”

Newsom’s office hasn’t received the letter, Daniel Villasenor, a spokesman for the governor, said.

His office noted that the California Air Resources Board weighs in on warehouse plans and has adopted new rules to curb truck smog, and has defended the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s rule requiring Los Angeles and Inland warehouses to cut emissions.

According to the letter, 90 percent of Southern California’s warehouse growth in the past decade occurred in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, which now has 1 billion square feet of warehouse space with another 170 million square feet approved or pending.

Inland warehouse truck traffic generates 15 billion pounds per year of carbon dioxide, a major contributor to climate change, it says. It also adds 30 million pounds of nitric oxide and 300,000 pounds of diesel particulates, both blamed for health ailments, with diesel particulates linked to cancer.

New warehouses are now under construction at five times the Inland population growth rate, and efforts to phase out diesel truck engines in California won’t be completed until 2045 – and won’t solve concerns for warehouse worker safety, truck noise and traffic, the letter read.

More than 300 warehouses are 1,000 feet or less from 139 Inland Empire schools, according to the letter, and 60 percent of residents who live within a quarter mile of a warehouse are Latino.

“Continued warehouse growth despite community harm and widespread neighborhood opposition is environmental racism in its classic terms,” the letter argues.

In his piece, Hagman called warehouse moratoriums or bans “misguided proposals (that) gloss over the real-world and draconian impact their potential bans would have on supply chains in local communities and the entire region.”

— Dana Bartholomew

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
Read more
  • Study: Ontario is the hub for logistics warehouses in the IE
  • Inland Empire No. 3 in U.S. for large warehouse leases
  • Blowback: Communities fighting warehouse surge

The post IE warehouse boom generates call for building moratorium appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 31 January 2023
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Hawkins Way, Värde buy defunct Marriott East Side hotel →← Long Beach’s Golden Shore megaproject goes on sale
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM