• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Redondo Beach nixes builder’s remedy plan for 35 apartments

SLH Investments' Leo Pustilnikov, rendering of 1021 North Harbor Drive (Getty, City of Redondo Beach, Kevin Scanlon)
SLH Investments’ Leo Pustilnikov, rendering of 1021 North Harbor Drive (Getty, City of Redondo Beach, Kevin Scanlon)

The city of Redondo Beach has thrown a punch at developer Leo Pustilnikov, who plans to redevelop a local power plant and a former marine aquarium next door into thousands of homes under the state builder’s remedy provision.

The City Council has upheld an administrative decision to reject Pustilnikov’s permit application to build a 35-unit mixed-use apartment complex at the former SEA Lab aquarium at 1021 North Harbor Drive, the Torrance Daily Breeze reported.

The proposal, which the city ruled incomplete, was filed in tandem with a controversial plan to redevelop the coastal AES Power Plant with 2,300 homes, offices, shops, restaurants and more. 

Pustilnikov, a partner in Beverly Hills-based SLH Investments, bought the 49-acre plant and the 2-acre offsite aquarium, which once served as a pump house for AES. The deal closed in 2020 for $150 million.

The smaller project, dubbed Ten21, would include a six-story building with 35 apartments, seven to be set aside as affordable for low-income residents, plus 8,500 square feet of storefronts.

The builder’s remedy, built into state housing law since 1990, forces cities and counties to bypass local zoning rules and automatically approve projects with enough affordable units if they’ve failed to adopt state plans to build more housing. 

For its latest housing element, the state determined Redondo Beach must plan for 2,500 new homes. By last spring, however, the city had twice failed to submit a compliant plan. 

In July, Pustilnikov filed a builder’s remedy application for the Ten21 mixed-use project, across the street from the power plant. A few weeks later, he filed a similar application for One Redondo, the urban village proposal to replace the plant set to close on Dec. 31.

In November, he also submitted a development permit application for Ten21 under state Senate Bill 330, which bars governments from rejecting projects for low-income residents.

The City Council this week upheld a previous decision by Community Development Director Brandy Forbes that the permit application was incomplete. 

City officials say residential buildings aren’t allowed at that site because the land is now designated for “coastal commercial” use. So before the city can officially receive and consider the permit application, Pustilnikov must apply for amendments to the city’s general plan, its local coastal program and its zoning and land use plans.

The California Coastal Commission, meanwhile, would likely have to OK any changes to Redondo’s local coastal program. And under Redondo’s City Charter, any major land-use change would require voter approval.

It’s unclear, however, whether the state housing mandates could override those requirements, according to the Breeze. It’s  also unclear whether Pustilnikov would apply for the amendments — though he has argued they shouldn’t be necessary.

“We dispute that the city can lawfully require a General Plan, LCP and/or zone change amendment in this case,” Michael Shonafelt, Pustilnikov’s attorney for Ten21, said in an email to the newspaper.  “In the wake of last night’s decision, we are considering our options.”

Shonafelt called the notice of incompleteness a rejection of the project, saying the builder’s remedy provision and SB 330 — the latter of which gives more teeth to the former — would require the city to process the application regardless of its own rules.

Forbes disagreed.

“It wasn’t a denial,” Forbes said of the decision. Rather, the letter gave “an option for a path forward; if the client wants to do residential uses, (they) must apply for (the) amendments.”

If the developer reapplies correctly, according to the city, Forbes can approve the project at her own discretion.

Read more
  • Builder’s justice: How a legal loophole could reshape California
  • Meet the developer giving California NIMBYs nightmares
  • Redevelopment planned for 49-acre power plant in Redondo Beach

The post Redondo Beach nixes builder’s remedy plan for 35 apartments appeared first on The Real Deal Los Angeles.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 10 February 2023
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Nelson Rising, whose projects helped shape today’s California, dies →← Transfer tax dries up multifamily financing in LA
  • Recent Posts

    • Mayor Karen Bass blasts everyone but herself for wildfire mishandling May 7, 2025
    • WEA, Beverly Hills Estates cut deal on $27M Malibu Colony home May 7, 2025
    • Oil firm eyes homes, hotel near Bolsa Chica wetlands in Huntington Beach May 7, 2025
    • Bankrupt Rite Aid to market 1.3K stores, including dozens in LA County May 7, 2025
    • Carolwood flexes with new LA pocket listings portal, boasting $1B+ in inventory May 7, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM