• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Mohamed Hadid settles suit against Zach Vella over Beverly Crest site

Mohamed Hadid has settled a lawsuit against developer Zach Vella in relation to a partially built Beverly Crest mansion that was once listed for sale at $250 million. 

In September 2022, Hadid, through an entity called Treetop Development, sued Vella’s Skylark Capital for perpetrating a “loan-to-own scheme” on 9650 Cedarbrook Drive, a planned 78,000-square-foot home that’s reportedly the largest-ever permitted residential development in Los Angeles. Beverly Crest is a section of L.A. overlooking Beverly Hills.

The dispute related to a $92.8 million mortgage on the mansion property. In a complaint filed in California’s Central District bankruptcy court, Hadid claimed that Vella only provided a $29 million chunk of the promised figure. “This in turn led to the construction project not being timely completed and Treetop unable to timely pay the subcontractors performing the work,” the complaint states. 

On April 23, Hadid filed a motion asking a judge to approve the settlement, court records show. Treetop agreed to the deal with Skylark Capital’s servicer, Skylark (UK) Servicing LLC. 

“The parties have now reached an agreement that consensually addresses their various disputes, will facilitate a sale and potential plan process, and maximize the value of the debtor’s property which will serve to benefit the debtor’s estate and all of its creditors,” the court filing reads.  

 Under the terms of the agreement, Hadid will sell the property on an “as is where is” basis with the possibility that Skylark itself will lodge a bid for the 37-acre site. 

The deal sets Skylark’s secured claim at $40 million. The figure is much lower than the $63 million that Vella claimed at the time the lawsuit was filed. The agreement also extends the maturity date and increases the debtor-in-possession financing on the property to $16.6 million. 

In its motion, Hadid’s counsel said that the embattled developer may not be able to afford a long legal fight. 

“The costs of discovery, expert testimony and trial would be very costly and time intensive, and would likely involve multiple trial days. Additionally, the debtor may not have the resources to fully pursue a final judgment against the Skylark parties,” the court filing states. 

A possible wrinkle in the deal is the intervention of the City of Los Angeles. In January, Hadid sued the city for canceling the building permits for the site. The court issued an order that reinstated the building permits for the site. In an objection to the settlement, the city claimed that the settlement should not be approved because it would give Hadid more resources to sue taxpayers. 

“The settlement funds further litigation over the issue and also enables the expansion of litigation into other areas that seek damages against city taxpayers. Even if the settlement would lead to payment in full to all creditors, the settlement does nothing but drive the parties further into two camps: the City of Los Angeles versus virtually everyone else,” the city’s filing reads.  

The city has since appealed the decision, with hearings set for May 6 and May 10, court records show. Hadid could not be reached for comment. 

The post Mohamed Hadid settles suit against Zach Vella over Beverly Crest site appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 08 May 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
JLL tapped to market Gas Company Tower in DTLA for sale →← Afterpay co-founder buys $65M mansion in priciest LA deal this year
  • Recent Posts

    • Hoteliers sound the alarm on looming distress  May 24, 2025
    • Growth markets see retail boom even with tariff uncertainty May 24, 2025
    • Westchester resi project gets city OK after union drops objection May 23, 2025
    • WATCH: ‘Father of CMBS’ Ethan Penner to run for governor of California May 23, 2025
    • Fashion Island office fetches $756 psf May 23, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM