• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Leo Pustilnikov tangles with red tape over builder’s remedy in Beverly Hills

Leo Pustilnikov has run into a labyrinth of red tape put up by Beverly Hills to stave off a builder’s remedy project with apartments and a hotel that defies the city’s zoning rules.

The locally based developer and pioneer in employing the state housing provision to bypass zoning has been thwarted by a city government that refuses to process his proposal to build a 165-unit complex and 73-room hotel at 125-129 South Linden Drive, Urbanize Los Angeles reported. 

Late last month, the Beverly Hills City Council unanimously voted to deny an appeal by Pustilnikov challenging what the city claimed was an incomplete application, putting the project in limbo.

The Ukrainian-born developer had rattled the affluent city in October 2022 with a preliminary proposal to employ the legal loophole for what was initially a 16-story, 200-unit complex. It’s now 19 stories with fewer units.

The builder’s remedy allows housing developers to skirt local zoning in cities such as Beverly Hills that failed to certify their state-mandated housing plans, provided the project includes 20 percent affordable housing.

Beverly Hills had missed its deadline — and Pustilnikov was the first to pounce. He previously bought the development site, a vacant building and parking lot on the corner of Wilshire Boulevard, in 2019 for $16 million.  

But rather than process Pustilnikov’s application, the city has focused on procedure, according to Urbanize.

In determining that his project application was incomplete, Beverly Hills argued the project had lost its vesting rights under SB 330 because he added the hotel between the preliminary and later project applications.

The city argued that the revised proposal constitutes a distinct project from the original, while Pustilnikov contends the new plan hasn’t changed enough to lose vesting rights.

At the same time, Beverly Hills has repeatedly instructed Pustilnikov to apply for a general plan amendment and a zone change for the project — which the city would have the authority to approve or deny. 

Putsilnikov has declined to request those entitlements, as the builder’s remedy is intended to override local zoning rules. 

This spring, the state Department of Housing and Community Development implied in an April 2024 letter to the City of Compton that the remedy doesn’t prevent the city from requiring “discretionary permits and/or legislative actions,” which Beverly Hills cited in affirming its stance on the Linden Drive project.

Then the housing regulator fired off a letter to Beverly Hills dismissing the rationale used in its Compton letter as “absurd” — while recommending the city grant Pustilnikov’s appeal and process the apartment and hotel tower.

The outcome of the ongoing fight over Linden Drive could have major implications for the city, according to Urbanize. There are more than a half-dozen other proposals which made use of the builder’s remedy before the certification of the city’s “housing element” plan, including other proposed high-rise buildings.

— Dana Bartholomew

Read more

  • Pustilnikov strikes again with ‘builder’s remedy’ in Beverly Hills
  • Developer proposes five-story apartment building in Beverly Hills

The post Leo Pustilnikov tangles with red tape over builder’s remedy in Beverly Hills appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 02 July 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Patrick Carroll booked on felony charge in LA →← Soboroff Partners, Gerschel family sell Malibu’s Park at Cross Creek
  • Recent Posts

    • SoCal resi market sees wave of deal cancellations continue July 2, 2025
    • Related, Newland acquire former Forever 21 HQ in $120M deal July 2, 2025
    • LA office availability increases “amidst uncertainty over industry consolidation” July 2, 2025
    • California legislature overhauls CEQA to pave way for construction boom July 1, 2025
    • Trousdale Estates nabs neighborhood’s priciest trade this year with $32M close July 1, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • July 2025
      • June 2025
      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM