• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Justice Department investigates California Realtors’ sales paperwork

Federal investigators will look into California Association of Realtors’ forms and contracts that a national consumer group calls “anti-consumer” and “unreadable.”

The U.S. Justice Department has launched a “formal inquiry” into the trade group’s paperwork for home sales drafted ahead of a national real estate commission settlement slated to take effect next month, the Orange County Register reported.

The Consumer Federation of America maintains the documents contain “anti-consumer provisions,” according to an analysis. It said the association’s new buyer-agent representation agreement was “too disorganized and complex for the average homebuyer to understand.”

The 200,000-member California Association of Realtors, in response, said that the Consumer Federation had issued a “misguided critique” of draft forms that remain “a work in progress.”

The local trade group has been revising dozens of standard forms, addenda and contracts to comply with the commission settlement set to go into effect Aug. 17. Realtors use the forms and contracts for housing transactions.

The National Association of Realtors reached the proposed settlement in March with plaintiffs in a federal class-action lawsuit challenging seller payments of buyer agent commissions.

The settlement would ban home-sales agents from posting offers to pay buyer commissions in an MLS, a Realtor-run listing database. Such offers still could be publicized by other means, and seller-paid commissions could continue. Home shoppers must sign contracts with agents before visiting any homes. 

One Realtor-group official estimated that four out of five buyers close on a home without such a contract.

In late June, the California Association of Realtors said it would delay the release of 19 forms after receiving the Department of Justice inquiry, saying it needed additional time to consider the department’s concerns, according to the Register.

Association officials declined to reveal details of the inquiry or to say what the DoJ’s concerns were. Justice Department officials also declined to respond to a reporter’s request for details of the probe.

While the government has looked into “potentially anticompetitive conduct” by NAR and has monitored the commission settlement, this is the first public report that a federal agency has launched an investigation of the state Realtor group.

The Consumer Federation issued 19-page critiques of two new California Association of Realtors contracts — the “Buyer Representation and Broker Compensation Agreement” and the “Residential Listing Agreement.”

In a June report, University at Buffalo law professor Tanya Monestier called the buyer representation agreement “virtually unreadable” because of its formatting, numbering and lettering scheme, extensive cross-referencing and “complicated and inconsistent language.”

“No layperson will be able to understand and appreciate the terms they are agreeing to,” Monestier wrote.

She added that pay provisions “are drafted in a way that disguises the obligation of the buyer to pay his agent” and “telegraph how Realtors plan to circumvent the NAR settlement.”

In a separate report, Monestier wrote that only 20 percent of CAR’s listing agreement, a “monster of a document” that sets out terms for a home sale, would be understandable to the average seller. In addition, she wrote, CAR’s draft listing agreement contained “provisions that are substantively unfair to a seller.”

Read more

  • Beverly Hills brokers make sense of NAR settlement
  • NAR strikes landmark deal spelling end of 6% commissions
  • “Everything changes now”: Here’s what NAR’s $418M settlement means for broker commissions 

The Realtor association argued in online posts that Monestier’s critiques contained flaws. It said it was “absurd” to suggest that offers of compensation outside the MLS bypasses the NAR settlement.

“The (Consumer Federation) report contains wild speculations that brokers using CAR forms will try to get around the NAR settlement,” the association said. “CAR supports the goals of the settlement.”

— Dana Bartholomew

The post Justice Department investigates California Realtors’ sales paperwork appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 18 July 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Brookfield’s Gas Company Tower in DTLA heads to auction →← LA sues Airbnb guru over allegedly illegal short-term rental listings
  • Recent Posts

    • Late Quincy Jones’ manse in Bel-Air seeks $60M May 12, 2025
    • Mystery buyer of $51M warehouse in Lake Forest revealed May 12, 2025
    • Trump orders VA to build 6K homes for veterans in West LA May 12, 2025
    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM