• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

State bill would limit homebuyer agent’s contracts to 90 days

A California legislator has proposed a law that would limit contracts between homebuyers and their brokers to about 90 days.

Assemblywoman Stephanie Nguyen, D-Elk Grove, has introduced a bill to limit homebuyer-agent contracts required under the National Association of Realtors legal settlement to three months, the Orange County Register reported.

If Assembly Bill 2992 passes, California would become one of at least 20 states with mandatory buyer-broker contract laws. The proposed law would take effect Jan. 1.

“Without legal protection, buyers and brokers are susceptible to potential disputes over compensation, legal uncertainties and conflicts of interest,” Nguyen said during a committee hearing in June.

Sellers now sign listing agreements consenting to pay both buyer and seller commissions when their transaction closes.

But the vast majority of buyers purchase a home without signing an agreement with their agents.

Just 41 percent of U.S. homebuyers had a written agreement with their agents as of June, according to the National Association of Realtors’ most recent “Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers,” which surveyed 6,817 buyers. 

Among first-time buyers, only a third had written agreements, the survey showed.

That will change under the NAR’s proposed legal settlement, effective Aug. 17, which shifts responsibility for paying buyer agents to buyers themselves, unless they get sellers to cover those costs. The association was found guilty last fall for conspiring with other major organizations to violate antitrust laws and inflate agent commissions. 

Under the pact, NAR will abolish its longstanding rule requiring sellers to say how much they’ll pay a buyer’s agent when posting their home on the Multiple Listing Service. Instead, such offers will be banned from the MLS database of homes for sale.

In addition, buyers must sign representation agreements before their agent can begin showing them homes.

Under AB 2992, state law would also mandate such contracts, according to the Register.

The agreements would end automatically after three months unless both sides agree in writing to extend it or unless the buyer is a corporation, LLC or partnership.

The contracts must be signed before buyers can bid on a home, and must spell out agent compensation, when payment is due, services to be rendered and the contract’s end date.

As of July, 19 U.S. states required buyer representation agreements, including Washington, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Maryland, according to WERC, which advises relocated workers on buying homes. A similar law will take effect in Oregon next year.

— Dana Bartholomew

Read more

  • Judge approves NAR settlement, brokerages face 60-day deadline
  • More legal woes for NAR as court revives lawsuit
  • Real estate industry not happy with NAR amid controversy 

The post State bill would limit homebuyer agent’s contracts to 90 days appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 13 August 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Financiers James Kohlberg and Mark Attanasio fight over sand in Malibu →← Hudson Pacific losses balloon 50% as office revenues dip
  • Recent Posts

    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM