• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

“Nothing for us to defend”: LA brokers eye NAR deadline

A couple posted on Reddit with a question from their search for a Pasadena-area home. They “love” their broker, they wrote.

Still, they hope to negotiate her commission under the new NAR rules, and asked fellow Redditors if it was true they must sign papers before seeing a single property. 

Enter a myriad of responses and opinions that make clear confusion still abounds on the eve of the National Association of Realtors’ deadline for new rules stemming from the Sitzer-Burnett class action lawsuit in Missouri federal court.

“If you ask the average person what the MLS stands for, they’re going to say, ‘Major League Soccer,’” said The Agency’s Jon Grauman. “Most people don’t understand the terms and nomenclature of real estate. Why would they? It’s not part of their daily lives.”

But the stakes are becoming clearer. The California Regional Multiple Listing Service released an updated fine schedule for the new rules, including a $2,500 penalty for disclosing listing or buyer agent commissions and $2,500 for showing a property without a signed buyer agreement. Agents receive no warning for either infraction, just the bill.

There’s no excuse for agents who are still confused, said Anthony Marguleas, the founder of Pacific Palisades-based boutique brokerage Amalfi Estates.

“The lawsuit started in 2019, so we’ve technically had five years to get ready for this,” Marguleas said. “The people that aren’t ready, it’s pretty surprising. There have been hundreds and hundreds of emails and trainings over the last six months.”  

Marguleas said some of the discourse he’s seen in online industry forums has baffled him. 

“It’s pretty shocking how unprepared certain agents are,” Marguleas. “They still put in the private remarks, ‘Call me to discuss commission,’ which you’re not allowed to do.”

Stating the obvious

The Agency’s Ben Belack headed the brokerage’s sales meeting held days ahead of the deadline to discuss the new rules with his colleagues.

While he believes the brokerage’s agents understand the changes, the challenge is wrapping their minds around new conversations and clarifying client questions.

“Before, we had a standard of compensation. Now, we’re going to have a standard of behavior,” Belack said.

A common refrain around how brokers will adapt to increased negotiation and competition has been proving the value of agents’ work. Grauman said for most, that could feel like stating the obvious. 

“Our job as brokers right now is to educate, not defend. There’s nothing for us to defend,” Grauman said. “We just need to educate consumers on what’s the new world order. These are not changes to the law; they are changes to the internal way we conduct our business.” 

More turns ahead 

Ask anyone to forecast the state of the industry post-Aug. 17, and the responses reveal more questions than anything else.  

“Have you looked at how this is meant to be policed?” Grauman said. “They’re going to look to agents to essentially tattle on each other if someone is not abiding by the rules.”

One thing many agents have concluded: more litigation is likely.

“The lawsuit that started all of this had nothing to do with buyers; it was only sellers. So there’s dozens of additional lawsuits,” Marguleas said.

Days before the deadline, a group of Signature Sotheby’s International Realty agents filed an antitrust lawsuit in Michigan district court against the National Association of Realtors, the Michigan Association of Realtors and other industry groups. The lawsuit challenges those group’s requirement of membership and seeks class action status, according to court documents.  

Belack views ramifications of the Sitzer/Burnett settlements as not just limited to altering the way the NAR membership operates. Instead, it also stands to shake up how the trade organization itself operates. 

“Before, it was the sellers as the plaintiffs in the class action,” Belack said. “Now, it’s [NAR’s] membership. Did we ever think agents were going to sue NAR? Well, here it is.”

Read more

  • Boutique broker explains new CAR forms for residential agents
  • Beverly Hills brokerage looks to get ahead of NAR settlement rules
  • REBNY or not: New York’s residential scene braces for NAR deadline

The post “Nothing for us to defend”: LA brokers eye NAR deadline appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 16 August 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
SCAH-LA eyes nine-story affordable housing complex in Mid-Wilshire →← What OC city is the hottest residential market in the US?
  • Recent Posts

    • Carolwood asks “why wouldn’t we” as brokerage launches private listings portal May 10, 2025
    • Post-wildfires, shipping containers, 3D-printed homes provide temporary shelter May 9, 2025
    • Archer snack company leases 351K sf Dodger dog factory in Vernon May 9, 2025
    • One in three distressed borrowers handing back buildings, experts say May 9, 2025
    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM