• 0
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

Shopping Cart

GPAM
  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do

City cites wildfire risk, axes $500M resi project in Anaheim Hills

The City of Anaheim has killed a controversial plan by Salt Development to build nearly 500 luxury apartments in Anaheim Hills, citing the threat of wildfires.

The Anaheim City Council voted 5-2 to reject the seven-story, 498-unit complex and 40,000 square feet of commercial buildings proposed for Deer Canyon, south of the 91 Freeway off of Santa Ana Canyon Road, the Orange County Register reported.

The $500 million project, fought by neighbors, was approved late last month by the city Planning Commission.

But city staff had recommended denying the 76-acre development known as Hills Preserve in the hilly neighborhood south of Yorba Linda, saying so many homes would hamper wildfire evacuations.

Councilwoman Natalie Meeks, who represents Anaheim Hills, said the fear during wildfire evacuations is real — that it wasn’t right to put the buildings in an area designated by the state as a very high fire hazard severity zone.

Plans by the Salt Lake City-based developer had called for a Mid-Century Modern-style building with 498 luxury apartments, from studios up to three-bedroom units. It was to include a rooftop pool, bowling alley and sauna.

The project included a parking garage, six large-lot estate homes, plus two pads for 40,000 square feet of commercial buildings, likely medical offices and a restaurant.

Salt was to develop one side of the property and donate 46 acres, or 60 percent of the land, to the city to expand its adjacent Deer Canyon Park Preserve. The 103-acre wilderness, acquired in 1994, is now used for hiking and horseback riding.

The developer also upped its offer to $1 million, from $500,000, to fund affordable housing elsewhere in the city. It emphasized community fire protection, including plans to add fire hydrants, reduce vegetation and build retaining walls to help reduce fire risk.

Brian Hobbs, co-founder of Salt Development, argued that wildfire evacuation concerns had been exaggerated by residents who didn’t want development in their backyards.

“The opposition to this project is hammering away on fire safety and evacuation and inventing new facts and introducing new opinions because they know it’s emotional, scary and hopefully can scare the elected officials into rejecting a project,” Hobbs told the council.

Salt Development had notified the city that if the Hills Preserve was denied it could invoke the state builder’s remedy, which allows developers to bypass local zoning rulings in cities that have failed to certify their state housing plans, providing they meet a threshold for affordable housing.

The builder said it has builder’s remedy plans that call for 1,280 homes on the site, with the required 20 percent affordable units threshold.

“After last night, we are reviewing all of our options regarding the property,” a spokesperson for the project told the Register.

— Dana Bartholomew

Read more

  • Salt Development moves forward on $500M multifamily in Anaheim Hills
  • Salt Development eyes 500 apartments in Anaheim Hills
  • OC cities hustle to avoid builder’s remedy “travesty”

The post City cites wildfire risk, axes $500M resi project in Anaheim Hills appeared first on The Real Deal.

Powered by WPeMatico

  • 01 November 2024
  • The Real Deal
  • Uncategorized
  •  Like
Jamison and Arc Capital to convert Koreatown offices into homes →← Another court says Huntington Beach must obey state’s resi mandates
  • Recent Posts

    • LA County greenlights self-certification for Altadena rebuilding May 8, 2025
    • Irvine Company aims to transform golf course into village of 3K homes May 8, 2025
    • Former LA police commissioner, prominent attorney to list Bel-Air estate for $24M May 8, 2025
    • Movers: Gambino Group nabs LA, NY agents May 8, 2025
    • Sacramento investor lists 270K sf DTLA office park leasehold May 8, 2025
  • Recent Comments

    • Archives

      • May 2025
      • April 2025
      • March 2025
      • February 2025
      • January 2025
      • December 2024
      • November 2024
      • October 2024
      • September 2024
      • August 2024
      • July 2024
      • June 2024
      • May 2024
      • April 2024
      • March 2024
      • February 2024
      • January 2024
      • December 2023
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • October 2022
      • September 2022
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
      • July 2021
      • June 2021
      • May 2021
      • April 2021
      • March 2021
      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
    • Global Property and Asset Mangement, Inc.
      137 North Larchmont
      Los Angeles, California 90010
      +1 213-427-1127

    © 2025 GPAM